On Jul 9, 2009, at 12:12 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
I'm not sure. I'm assuming the only thing left is to guarantee that
the
Apache copyright is at the top of every file, and we've done a good
deal of
work to ensure this already (although there might be a file or two
that
slipped through the cracks). All contributor licenses have been
received.
The LICENSE.txt, NOTICE.txt and README.txt are at the root of the
project,
and contain the necessary notifications.
Is there anything else?
Odd, I could have sworn there were a number of issues for incubation
but I don't see them in the Jira.
IIRC, I don't think we confirmed that all the donated code has CLAs.
Also, wasn't there a tool developed (maven plugin, whatever) for use
by
incubating projects to ensure the build meets this criteria? I heard
rumblings of this, but I don't know if came to fruition or not. If
there
isn't a tool for this, what is the easiest way to guarantee we've
met IP
clearance requriements?
http://mojo.codehaus.org/rat-maven-plugin/
Regards,
Alan
- Les
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Craig L Russell <[email protected]
>wrote:
Hi Les,
I don't think there is an official policy, but:
I would feel *much* better about publishing snapshots only after we
have
done due diligence on our IP.
How much remains to be done?
Craig
On Jul 8, 2009, at 6:45 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
Hi Mentors,
Now that the name is solidified, we should be able to start
publishing
Maven
snapshots asap. However, we haven't fully completed the IP
clearance due
diligence. Are we allowed to start publishing Maven snapshots in
the mean
time? I *think* this is possible, I just need confirmation.
Also, if possible, how do we ensure that Hudson can publish these
snapshots
upon a successful build automatically?
Thanks,
Les
Craig L Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[email protected]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
