I've found the original thread where each member made these statements. Do we need to post it again (I did send this to Emmanuel in the past)?
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Les Hazlewood <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm fairly certain that Emmanuel already did that. > > The original codebase was LGPL. The only committers to that project all > presented written statements (via email) that they fully agreed with and > supported the move to the Apache 2.0 license. All committers did this prior > to the project being accepted into the Incubator. Those same committers are > now ASF committers and all of them have submitted their CLAs. > > Doesn't that cover it? > > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:40 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> On Jul 9, 2009, at 12:33 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >> >> Thanks for chiming in Alan, >>> >>> IIRC, I don't think we confirmed that all the donated code has CLAs. >>> >>> >>> How do we go about doing this? I thought we had CLAs for all >>> contributors. >>> If not, how do we check? >>> >> >> >> IIRC, the original code base was not licensed correctly, i.e. AL 2.0 >> compatible. If this is the case we have to go through the CVS history of >> the original donation and make sure that every author has submitted the >> proper documentation. Craig, what would that documentation be? >> >> >> Regards, >> Alan >> >> >
