Hi Les, On Jul 9, 2009, at 3:10 PM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
I've found the original thread where each member made these statements. Dowe need to post it again (I did send this to Emmanuel in the past)?
It would be good if the emails from all the original contributors were assembled and checked into svn so we don't have to go looking for them.
There is a place in Apache svn where we can put them: documents/ grants. If you tell me where the files are I can check them in. Then the STATUS file can refer to them and we're done.
Craig
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Les Hazlewood <[email protected]> wrote:I'm fairly certain that Emmanuel already did that.The original codebase was LGPL. The only committers to that project all presented written statements (via email) that they fully agreed with and supported the move to the Apache 2.0 license. All committers did this prior to the project being accepted into the Incubator. Those same committers arenow ASF committers and all of them have submitted their CLAs. Doesn't that cover it?On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:40 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected] >wrote:On Jul 9, 2009, at 12:33 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote: Thanks for chiming in Alan,IIRC, I don't think we confirmed that all the donated code has CLAs.How do we go about doing this? I thought we had CLAs for all contributors. If not, how do we check?IIRC, the original code base was not licensed correctly, i.e. AL 2.0compatible. If this is the case we have to go through the CVS history of the original donation and make sure that every author has submitted theproper documentation. Craig, what would that documentation be? Regards, Alan
Craig L Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[email protected] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
