Ed,

Of course you know that I've made a lot of long drivers for seniors' golf 
course play here in Tellico Village and around my home area. So, I just want to 
express another personal opinion that, yes, there can be a performance problem 
with square heads when used on long drivers (47" and 48"). By moving many ccs 
to the rear left and right, the face is shallower than most round-shaped 
450cc-460cc heads. My Quad driver face is almost "rectangular" (long and not as 
high) and combined with a bit more upright lie which puts the toe up a fair 
amount at 47" and me at 5' 9" tall, makes for a very small, angled impact area. 
Even with a correctly aligned shaft at my preferred differential deflection, my 
near center impact consistency is less than with my more round BOM 460cc head. 
And, especially a fade swing with the square head doesn't go near as far for me 
as a straight or draw swing...unlike my BOM, which hits a fade swing ball 
almost as far as a draw swing ball. So, though I think the square head plays 
very well at normal lengths, its shape combined with an upright lie can hurt 
the square head's performance on a long driver. With a lie around 55° (a guess 
without checking) instead of the "near 60°" on the Quad, it might be a lot 
better for longer clubs...wish someone would offer one those at 195 grams. I 
hit the Quad very long for me, when I hit it on center.

Someone on a golf forum mentioned that Tiger wouldn't play a square-shaped 
Sumo, because he couldn't work the ball with it very well. Seems to me that's a 
performance problem for some players, too. Would any high MOI 460cc head give 
him the same problem? Comments?

Bernie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Ed Reeder 
  To: ShopTalk@mail.msen.com 
  Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 8:44 PM
  Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Square Drivers?


  David,
  Just to clarify.  I simply said that Bernie reported poor performance with a 
square fairway wood.  I've never hit a Quadratic.

  My only point was that the shape of a clubhead, in and of itself, is not a 
key performance factor.

  /Ed

Reply via email to