> Quite so.
> I think, though, that Geovana is saying that both ends are controlled.
> In that case, it would be possible to increase throughput with a bond
> interface.
> It may be that ifenslave-ing ath0 and ath1 to a mode 0 kernel bonding
> device at both ends would do it, but it depends how the interface is set
> up, and what is between the two gateways. Point-to-point it should be
> fine; if it needs to be routed then some sort of tunneling devices would
> be needed. Setting that up isn't really a Shorewall question, though...
Thanks Dominic
Just my academic project to find the best option to get more throughput and
availability using multiple simultaneous connections in WiFi. Bonding is that I
use at link layer, while shorewall at the network and transport layer. Just I
am testing with bonding and shorewall , but bonding is designed for wired
networks and attempt to adapt it to wifi.
Geovana
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Special Offer -- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE!
Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better
price-free! And you'll get a free "Love Thy Logs" t-shirt when you
download Logger. Secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsisghtdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
