On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 11:23:45AM +0100, Petr Vanek wrote: > hi guys, > > the next community update is about to come up, would be nice to have > some SHR follow up, any ideas? i was looking up git changes etc... but > just one line of update from each dev would be enough.
Quite big FSO upgrade, upstream is now using separate configs for daemons in /etc/freesmartphone/* instead of huge frameworkd.conf with is nice. (In shr-u it's fsodeviced, fsousaged and fsonetworkd now). Also ubifs is worth of some one-liner there.. > On the same token, are there any plans to incorporate the kernel speed > ups s discussed on kernel list? If yes, would make sense to do this > before the CU. This would gain SHR some credit for being fast and > hopefully might attract more people, developers also? (is there any > more somewhere? :)) > > just my 2 czech crowns > > Petr First change (MTD_NAND_VERIFY_WRITE) pushed http://git.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/commit/?id=f72efbb544c45594650cd5380d8dd417aa257f5f Other changes and other shr kernels (2.6.29-rc3-drm, 2.6.31, 2.6.32) as soon as more people test and report it and preferably kernel guys commit it as defconfig changes in kernel repo. -- uin:136542059 jid:[email protected] Jansa Martin sip:[email protected] JaMa _______________________________________________ Shr-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-devel
