On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 12:26:30PM +0100, Petr Vanek wrote: > MJ> I would like to let this decission on kernel guys, PaulFertser > MJ> already sent his opinion. So it can be done even on > MJ> shr-kernel-config, but the decission is theirs (well they are > MJ> fixing bugs for shr-kernel). > > well, they do have to think it hard. i would opt for a stripped and dev > kernel. i have just tried Radek's kernel [1], look at my [2] results. do > you think i wanna go back to my distro kernel? :)) : > > booting procedure: > > radek's shr's > press pwr button: 0.00 0:00 > penguin logo off: 0:54 1:38 > X on: 1:08 2:03 > illume with icons:1:23 2:22 > > haven't done more tests yet. > > Petr
I see the difference and it's really nice, but I guess you would get simillar (maybe even better) numbers with .31 and .32 (they feel much faster here - can you please try your time measure?) And still we cannot make .31 or .32 new default shr kernel because there are few unresolved issues with suspend/resume - partially because there are DRM patches included and PaulFertser said that the issues are also with unmodified kernel from git.openmoko. BTW: new fsodeviced have rfkill plugin (disabled by default now) which is using /dev/rfkill which is not available in 2.6.29-rc3 (not sure about .31, but its in .32). Cheers, -- uin:136542059 jid:[email protected] Jansa Martin sip:[email protected] JaMa _______________________________________________ Shr-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-devel
