Martin, thank you :)

MJ> > the next community update is about to come up, would be nice to
MJ> > have some SHR follow up, any ideas? i was looking up git changes
MJ> > etc... but just one line of update from each dev would be enough.
MJ> 
MJ> Quite big FSO upgrade, upstream is now using separate configs for
MJ> daemons in /etc/freesmartphone/* instead of huge frameworkd.conf
MJ> with is nice. (In shr-u it's fsodeviced, fsousaged and fsonetworkd
MJ> now).

great

MJ> Also ubifs is worth of some one-liner there..

is it now proven to work? i haven't really followed the conversations
throughly enough to get a full picture.  

MJ> > On the same token, are there any plans to incorporate the kernel
MJ> > speed ups s discussed on kernel list? If yes, would make sense to

MJ> First change (MTD_NAND_VERIFY_WRITE) pushed
MJ> 
http://git.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/commit/?id=f72efbb544c45594650cd5380d8dd417aa257f5f

great

MJ> Other changes and other shr kernels (2.6.29-rc3-drm, 2.6.31,
MJ> 2.6.32) as soon as more people test and report it and preferably
MJ> kernel guys commit it as defconfig changes in kernel repo.


how does one test the other kernels? cannot see it in the repo (just
looking on web, reflashing - morning update broke my nand install
although i did use the described workaround...)

Kind Regards
Petr



_______________________________________________
Shr-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-devel

Reply via email to