Curtis was suggesting if address space is not as cheap as domain names,
then this scheme would not be used.
I picked up on the point that the RPKI does not effect address allocation
fees. Which it doesn't.
But Randy has addressed Curtis's point more accurately, as Curtis was
speaking of the RPKI as if it were a registry, so his comment about
pricing was probably directed to certs, not addresses.
I would hope that the RIRs would not charge for certs separately from
charging fees for address allocations. The RPKI will work best if *ALL*
address allocations have a corresponding cert. If that turns out to be a
cost to the recipient, we're likely to see people who choose not to get
the corresponding cert. That would IMHO be a bad thing.
--Sandy
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, Randy Bush wrote:
Prices for address allocations are not affected by the RPKI.
given that at least some RIRs are exploring how and what to charge for
certs, this is a bit naive.
randy
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
