I support this document going forward. the only comment I have is that I'd prefer to see a preference order in validation (section 3) to help relying party S/W writers to make efficient choices in the validation path - but that isn't a stopping block for me.
Cheers Terry On 28/10/09 12:48 PM, "Geoff Huston" <g...@apnic.net> wrote: > The WG chairs have received a Working Group Last Call request from the > authors of draft-ietf-sidr-roa-format-06.txt. > > The document (and the draft history) is at > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-roa-format-06 > > The Last Call will end as of the close of business on Monday 23rd > November - this is a longer period than a conventional 2 week last > call period in order to include the forthcoming SIDR WG meeting at > IETF 76. > > The intended status of this document is proposed standard. > > As usual, please address all comments to the WG mailing list, and > please be clear in your comments to this last call if you are > supporting the document's submission to the IESG or if you are > opposed, or if you are not expressing a view either way. As there are > a number of documents that are being last-called at this point in time > it would be appreciated if responses could clearly identify which > document is being referred to. > > Also with this note I would like to request the document's authors to > prepare an interoperability report. > > Thanks, > > Geoff > > WG Co-CHair hat ON > > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > sidr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
