Matt, In hindsight I think that any recommendations of ordering should exist in some other document (akin to the one you alluded to in the thread on sidr-arch-09 refresh cycle) which covers more operational aspects.
Cheers Terry On 6/11/09 6:46 AM, "Matt Lepinski" <mlepin...@bbn.com> wrote: > Terry, > > Can you elaborate on what you'd like to see in section 3 of the document? > [..] > > In any case, if the working group feels that there is a clear > recommended processing order that we can provide in Section 3 that will > increase the likelihood the implementors produce efficient software, > then please send some text and I'd be happy to insert it. > > - Matt Lepinski > _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
