I have reviewed the ROA format draft. In, general, I'm fine with sending it to the IESG now. Thanks again to the editors for putting together a readable doc.
As with the architecture document, I have some reservations about publishing the data format documents before the validation algorithm is solid, but I suspect this doc won't need to change.
It might be worthwhile to repeat in section 3 (validation) the requirement from section 7.2 of the architecture draft that "...a relying party must fetch new ROAs from the repository system before taking any routing action in response to a ROA revocation." -- Sam _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
