Russ White <r...@cisco.com> wrote: > To: Christopher Morrow <christopher.mor...@gmail.com> > >> * Is an Autonomous System (AS) authorized to originate an IP prefix >> * Is the AS-Path represented in the route the same as the path >> through which the route update traveled > > As we've been discussing on the list --I don't think this is a good > goal. The first goal should be to determine what it is we want to show > about the AS Path in relation to other things, and then work on filling > that goal.
The question I think we ought to care about is: Is the NLRI from this peer more or less likely than some other peer's NLRI to represent what a legitimate originator would want me to see? All I really have control over is which peer I send to (and thus which NLRI I forward to my peers). I have no control over what happens to the packets after than first forwarding step. -- John Leslie <j...@jlc.net> _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
