(my originaly wouldn't have made it to the list... so here it is again from the right src-addr)
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Chris Morrow <morr...@ops-netman.net> wrote: > > > On 02/18/11 12:11, John Leslie wrote: >> Russ White <r...@cisco.com> wrote: >>> To: Christopher Morrow <christopher.mor...@gmail.com> >>> >>>> * Is an Autonomous System (AS) authorized to originate an IP prefix >>>> * Is the AS-Path represented in the route the same as the path >>>> through which the route update traveled >>> >>> As we've been discussing on the list --I don't think this is a good >>> goal. The first goal should be to determine what it is we want to show >>> about the AS Path in relation to other things, and then work on filling >>> that goal. >> >> The question I think we ought to care about is: >> >> Is the NLRI from this peer more or less likely than some other peer's NLRI >> to represent what a legitimate originator would want me to see? >> >> All I really have control over is which peer I send to (and thus >> which NLRI I forward to my peers). I have no control over what happens >> to the packets after than first forwarding step. > > we can't (and shouldn't conflate here) packet security with routing > (routing data, really) security. > _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
