On 02/18/11 12:11, John Leslie wrote: > Russ White <r...@cisco.com> wrote: >> To: Christopher Morrow <christopher.mor...@gmail.com> >> >>> * Is an Autonomous System (AS) authorized to originate an IP prefix >>> * Is the AS-Path represented in the route the same as the path >>> through which the route update traveled >> >> As we've been discussing on the list --I don't think this is a good >> goal. The first goal should be to determine what it is we want to show >> about the AS Path in relation to other things, and then work on filling >> that goal. > > The question I think we ought to care about is: > > Is the NLRI from this peer more or less likely than some other peer's NLRI > to represent what a legitimate originator would want me to see? > > All I really have control over is which peer I send to (and thus > which NLRI I forward to my peers). I have no control over what happens > to the packets after than first forwarding step.
we can't (and shouldn't conflate here) packet security with routing (routing data, really) security. _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
