At Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:03:18 -0700, Terry Manderson wrote: > > Rob's observation that the extension exists in the manifest file name is a > close approximation provided words exist as highlighted which gives clear > instruction to implementers as to > 1) make the first approximation of validation regime on the filename in the > _manifest_ > 2) then try all others > 3) give up.
Sorry, wrong. Attempt validation based on the filename type; if that fails, the object is toast regardless of whether the filename appears in the manifest or not. Don't expect the RP to play guessing games. _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
