On 21/07/11 2:15 AM, "Rob Austein" <s...@isc.org> wrote: > At Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:03:18 -0700, Terry Manderson wrote: >> >> Rob's observation that the extension exists in the manifest file name is a >> close approximation provided words exist as highlighted which gives clear >> instruction to implementers as to >> 1) make the first approximation of validation regime on the filename in the >> _manifest_ >> 2) then try all others >> 3) give up. > > Sorry, wrong. Attempt validation based on the filename type; if that > fails, the object is toast regardless of whether the filename appears > in the manifest or not. Don't expect the RP to play guessing games.
You wouldn't check the manifest? The manifest seems like the hinge point to me. I think I'll have to reflect on why you select that direction. Cheers Terry _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
