> I am aware of a number of ebgp relationships where the two parties > disagree on the nature of their connections: > - the first party believes the second is a transit customer > - the second party believe the first is a peer
yep. as i said, i will save this part of the mess until we have shown that brian's approach at least deals with the basics, the gao-rexford fantasy that the world is flat. then we can see if we can stretch the solution to deal with these cases. > I am also aware of a number of intricate routing policies, along the > lines of in-country transit, per-continent peer, world-wide customer. that may be simpler. it may just be different policies for different prefixes. and we know it's all per prefix anyway. randy _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
