Hi Chris,
I know we already discussed this over private email, but perhaps you can
comment on the list on the future of the requested WG adoption call for
the ‘all resources’ applicability statement draft.
thanks!
-Carlos
On 2 Sep 2016, at 17:56, Chris Morrow wrote:
Howdy SIDR peeps,
(+bonus ops ad)
Following on the Berlin meeting we were trying to accomplish two
things:
1) get all documents related to sidr protocols into wglc and then
publication
2) get all documents which are more operationally focused moved
along to an ops group (sidr-ops or something akin to that)
With that in mind there are 8 documents in the publication queue:
draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration
draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs
draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops
draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-overview
draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles
draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol
draft-ietf-sidr-origin-validation-signaling
draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-rfc6810-bis
and 11 still in progress. Of the 11 left Sandy and I think they
roughly break down like:
Documents which should move to the ops group:
draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-rollover
draft-ietf-sidr-lta-use-cases
draft-ietf-sidr-route-server-rpki-light - authors notified/queried
about this
draft-ietf-sidr-rtr-keying
documents which should finish out in sidr:
draft-ietf-sidr-delta-protocol
draft-ietf-sidr-publication
draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup - pub request in flight
draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-tree-validation
draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered
draft-ietf-sidr-slurm - authors recently updated
draft-ietf-sidr-adverse-actions - wglc imminent
I think if there's no meaningful discussion on change for these
between now and 9/16/2016 (Sept 16th) we will assume this list is
correct. For documents in the 'move' list, if progress to publication
happens 'good!'. For all documents in the 'stays' list:
1) we aim to have wglc by Seoul
2) publication requests started on as many as possible
We plan to meet in Seoul, but not in Chicago (Mar 2017) where we
expect the ops group to exist and meet. We can progress documents in
SIDR after Seoul, but the WG should close out shortly after the new
year. (or that's the goal).
Thoughts?
-chris
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
