On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Rob Austein <s...@hactrn.net> wrote: > I guess one question here is the purpose of publishing this document: > > a) If the purpose of asking the WG to publish is a hope that the WG > will agree that this is a good idea, then I'm with Randy and Steve > in the "hell no" camp. > > (note, I do not care for this message about politics)
we're here because, I think, from the top down to the RIR there isn't a hierarchy being created, right? the RIR folk are saying: "Ok, you all want this thing, but upstairs hasn't created the root, so we're going to do the best we can with making a root each that allows us to xfer between RIRs. This is how it's being done, so you have some docs about the mechanics involved and can build/guide from there" is that not the case? (again, I don't care about the politics) > b) If the purpose is to document something that the RIRs have > unilaterally decided to do whether the IETF likes it or not, I > guess we should thank them for documenting their intentions, and > publish it with a big IETF / IESG disclaimer saying that it's a > really bad idea but not something the IETF can prevent. I suppose > we could refuse to publish entirely in this case, but suspect that > just makes it harder for newcomers to understand what happened. > > My understanding was that we were already well into case (b) territory. >
_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
