Fujisaki-san, Let me clarify one thing.
Do you intend to changing minimum allocation size only for old /23 blocks where we reserved /29 for each LIRs, or for all blocks? Rgs, Masato On 14/01/27 22:19, "(Tomohiro -INSTALLER- Fujisaki/藤崎 智宏)" <fujis...@syce.net> wrote: > >Hi, > >Guangliang, thank you so much for explaining current situation. >I was just drafting my reply mail:-) > >David, what Guangliang mentioned is almost same as my drafted reply >mail, with smarter and clearer explanation. > >Yours Sincerely, >-- >Tomohiro Fujisaki > > >From: Guangliang Pan <g...@apnic.net> >Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-111-v001: Request-based expansion of IPv6 >default allocation size >Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 05:20:30 +0000 > > | Hi David, > | > | I think that statement refers to early IPv6 allocations from the old >/23 blocks. Before APNIC received the /12 allocation from IANA, we use >sequence allocation method to make /32 allocations and reserved up to /29 >for every allocation. That was the practice for all RIRs in the early >stage. I believe this policy proposal is trying to address those reserved >space. > | > | APNIC has been using spare allocation method to make IPv6 allocations >from the /12 block since we received it from IANA. We don't do >reservation in sparse allocation, but in fact every allocation has a room >to grow. Current /32 allocations from the /12 block can grow up to /24 at >this stage. > | > | Best regards, > | > | Guangliang > | ========= > | > | > | From: sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net >[mailto:sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net] On Behalf Of David Conrad > | Sent: Monday, 27 January 2014 11:30 AM > | To: SIG policy > | Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-111-v001: Request-based expansion of >IPv6 default allocation size > | > | However, the space up to /29 is reserved by APNIC secretariat for each >/32 allocation. > | > | I thought the spare allocation method the RIRs agreed to use for IPv6 >in order to get the /12 from the IANA precluded the need to reserve any >address space. > | > | Does APNIC still reserve address space? > | > | Thanks, > | -drc > | > | >* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * >_______________________________________________ >sig-policy mailing list >sig-policy@lists.apnic.net >http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
