Hi Masato-san, My intention is to modify initial allocation criteria up to /29 for all members (in all blocks).
Yours Sincerely, -- Tomohiro Fujisaki From: Masato Yamanishi <myama...@japan-telecom.com> Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-111-v001: Request-based expansion of IPv6 default allocation size Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:50:24 -0800 | Fujisaki-san, | | Let me clarify one thing. | | Do you intend to changing minimum allocation size only for old /23 blocks | where we reserved /29 for each LIRs, or for all blocks? | | Rgs, | Masato | | | | On 14/01/27 22:19, "(Tomohiro -INSTALLER- Fujisaki/藤崎 智宏)" | <fujis...@syce.net> wrote: | | > | >Hi, | > | >Guangliang, thank you so much for explaining current situation. | >I was just drafting my reply mail:-) | > | >David, what Guangliang mentioned is almost same as my drafted reply | >mail, with smarter and clearer explanation. | > | >Yours Sincerely, | >-- | >Tomohiro Fujisaki | > | > | >From: Guangliang Pan <g...@apnic.net> | >Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-111-v001: Request-based expansion of IPv6 | >default allocation size | >Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 05:20:30 +0000 | > | > | Hi David, | > | | > | I think that statement refers to early IPv6 allocations from the old | >/23 blocks. Before APNIC received the /12 allocation from IANA, we use | >sequence allocation method to make /32 allocations and reserved up to /29 | >for every allocation. That was the practice for all RIRs in the early | >stage. I believe this policy proposal is trying to address those reserved | >space. | > | | > | APNIC has been using spare allocation method to make IPv6 allocations | >from the /12 block since we received it from IANA. We don't do | >reservation in sparse allocation, but in fact every allocation has a room | >to grow. Current /32 allocations from the /12 block can grow up to /24 at | >this stage. | > | | > | Best regards, | > | | > | Guangliang | > | ========= | > | | > | | > | From: sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net | >[mailto:sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net] On Behalf Of David Conrad | > | Sent: Monday, 27 January 2014 11:30 AM | > | To: SIG policy | > | Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-111-v001: Request-based expansion of | >IPv6 default allocation size | > | | > | However, the space up to /29 is reserved by APNIC secretariat for each | >/32 allocation. | > | | > | I thought the spare allocation method the RIRs agreed to use for IPv6 | >in order to get the /12 from the IANA precluded the need to reserve any | >address space. | > | | > | Does APNIC still reserve address space? | > | | > | Thanks, | > | -drc | > | | > | | >* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy | > * | >_______________________________________________ | >sig-policy mailing list | >sig-policy@lists.apnic.net | >http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy | | | | * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
