Guanliang, How many allocations did we make from the old /23 blocks?
Rgs, Masato Yamanishi On 14/01/27 21:20, "Guangliang Pan" <g...@apnic.net> wrote: > Hi David, > > I think that statement refers to early IPv6 allocations from the old /23 > blocks. Before APNIC received the /12 allocation from IANA, we use sequence > allocation method to make /32 allocations and reserved up to /29 for every > allocation. That was the practice for all RIRs in the early stage. I believe > this policy proposal is trying to address those reserved space. > > APNIC has been using spare allocation method to make IPv6 allocations from the > /12 block since we received it from IANA. We don’t do reservation in sparse > allocation, but in fact every allocation has a room to grow. Current /32 > allocations from the /12 block can grow up to /24 at this stage. > > Best regards, > > Guangliang > ========= > > > > From: sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net > [mailto:sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net] On Behalf Of David Conrad > Sent: Monday, 27 January 2014 11:30 AM > To: SIG policy > Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-111-v001: Request-based expansion of IPv6 > default allocation size > >>> >>> However, the space up to /29 is reserved by APNIC secretariat for each /32 >>> allocation. > > > I thought the spare allocation method the RIRs agreed to use for IPv6 in order > to get the /12 from the IANA precluded the need to reserve any address space. > > > > Does APNIC still reserve address space? > > > > Thanks, > > -drc > > > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list > sig-policy@lists.apnic.net > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
