Skeeve, As acting chair, I'm neutral for each proposal, but even for me, proposed text sounds everybody can get AS by just saying "I need it within 6 months" without any explanation howto use it. If your intension is covering more usecases, but not allowing for everyone, can you tweak proposed text?
> 4. Proposed policy solution > --------------------------- > > An organization is eligible for an ASN assignment if it: > - Is planning to use it within next 6 months Masato Yamanishi Feb 25, 2015 6:03 PM、Skeeve Stevens <ske...@v4now.com> のメッセージ: > Dean, > > What you are saying is your rose coloured view of this. > > "You say they can get an ASN anytime they need one for operation purposes". > I am saying that the case exists that operators will want to do this - > WITHOUT the requirement for being multi-homed. > > The requirement for being multi-homed, 'as written' causes members to either > lie to provide false information or find a way around the restriction (using > HE or someone else) to choose how they wish to manage their network. > > You choosing to ignore this use case or situation doesn't make it go away > because you don't understand why they would want to manage their network in > that way. > > > > > ...Skeeve > > Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker > v4Now - an eintellego Networks service > ske...@v4now.com ; www.v4now.com > Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve > facebook.com/v4now ; linkedin.com/in/skeeve > twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com > > IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers > >> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Dean Pemberton <d...@internetnz.net.nz> >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Skeeve Stevens <ske...@v4now.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> I'm asking that the policy reflect an operators choice to decide how they >>> manage their networks should they choose to do it that way. >> >> I believe we've entered the point of diminishing returns here. >> >> It has been shown multiple times in this thread that there is no barrier to >> getting an ASN if one is required under the current policy. This fact has >> been supported by the current hostmasters. Operators currently have the >> freedom to choose how to manage their networks, they can choose to get an >> ASN anytime they need one for operational purposes. >> >> There is no change in policy required. >> >> I strongly oppose this policy as written. > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy mailing list > sig-policy@lists.apnic.net > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
