We will have new wording soon.
...Skeeve *Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker* *v4Now - *an eintellego Networks service ske...@v4now.com ; www.v4now.com Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve facebook.com/v4now ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau> linkedin.com/in/skeeve twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 7:03 AM, Masato Yamanishi <myama...@gmail.com> wrote: > Skeeve, > > As acting chair, I'm neutral for each proposal, but even for me, proposed > text sounds everybody can get AS by just saying "I need it within 6 months" > without any explanation howto use it. > If your intension is covering more usecases, but not allowing for > everyone, can you tweak proposed text? > > > 4. Proposed policy solution > > --------------------------- > > > > An organization is eligible for an ASN assignment if it: > > - Is planning to use it within next 6 months > > Masato Yamanishi > > > Feb 25, 2015 6:03 PM、Skeeve Stevens <ske...@v4now.com> のメッセージ: > > Dean, > > What you are saying is your rose coloured view of this. > > "You say they can get an ASN anytime they need one for operation > purposes". I am saying that the case exists that operators will want to do > this - WITHOUT the requirement for being multi-homed. > > The requirement for being multi-homed, 'as written' causes members to > either lie to provide false information or find a way around the > restriction (using HE or someone else) to choose how they wish to manage > their network. > > You choosing to ignore this use case or situation doesn't make it go away > because you don't understand why they would want to manage their network in > that way. > > > > > ...Skeeve > > *Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker* > *v4Now - *an eintellego Networks service > ske...@v4now.com ; www.v4now.com > > Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve > > facebook.com/v4now ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau> > linkedin.com/in/skeeve > > twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com > > > IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Dean Pemberton <d...@internetnz.net.nz> > wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Skeeve Stevens <ske...@v4now.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> I'm asking that the policy reflect an operators choice to decide how >>> they manage their networks should they choose to do it that way. >>> >>> >>> >> I believe we've entered the point of diminishing returns here. >> >> It has been shown multiple times in this thread that there is no barrier >> to getting an ASN if one is required under the current policy. This fact >> has been supported by the current hostmasters. Operators currently have >> the freedom to choose how to manage their networks, they can choose to get >> an ASN anytime they need one for operational purposes. >> >> There is no change in policy required. >> >> I strongly oppose this policy as written. >> >> >> > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy mailing list > sig-policy@lists.apnic.net > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > >
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
