How so?
If not, then this should be brought into scope because controlling traffic > and AS-loops using private ASNs becomes challenging for organisations that > have single-homed-but-multiple-links-to-same-provider-scenarios > > > > Regards, > Usman > > > On 27 Feb 2015, at 5:10 pm, Skeeve Stevens <ske...@v4now.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ske...@v4now.com');>> wrote: > > This is where the big different in philosophy is. > > I want to be able to choose to get an ASN and ready my network to be > multi-homed - 'at some point' > > Dean says do it with private ASN and then reconfigure your network when > you are ready. > > Frankly, I still think this is telling me how to plan the building of my > networks - and telling me when I should do the work. > > > ...Skeeve > > *Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker* > *v4Now - *an eintellego Networks service > ske...@v4now.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ske...@v4now.com');> ; > www.v4now.com > > Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve > > facebook.com/v4now ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau> > linkedin.com/in/skeeve > > twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com > > > IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Dean Pemberton <d...@internetnz.net.nz > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','d...@internetnz.net.nz');>> wrote: > >> It did say "immediate future". >> I would say that it seems reasonable that if you're claiming that >> you're going to multihome in the "immediate future" that you would >> know the ASNs with whom you were going to peer. >> >> If it was more of a "Well at some point we might want to multihome", >> then you might not know the ASN. But in those situations RFC1930 says >> that you should be using a private AS until such time as you are >> closer to peering. >> >> Dean >> -- >> Dean Pemberton >> >> Technical Policy Advisor >> InternetNZ >> +64 21 920 363 (mob) >> d...@internetnz.net.nz >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','d...@internetnz.net.nz');> >> >> To promote the Internet's benefits and uses, and protect its potential. >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Aftab Siddiqui >> <aftab.siddi...@gmail.com >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','aftab.siddi...@gmail.com');>> wrote: >> > Hi Guangliang, >> > >> >> >> >> The option "b" is acceptable. >> >> >> >> b. If an applicant can demonstrate a plan to be multihomed in >> >> immediate future, it is not a must they are physically multihomed >> >> at the time of submitting a request >> > >> > >> > But even then applicant has to provide the details of those ASN with >> whom >> > they may or may not multhome in future. right? >> > >> > Regards, >> > >> > Aftab A. Siddiqui >> > >> > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy >> > * >> > _______________________________________________ >> > sig-policy mailing list >> > sig-policy@lists.apnic.net >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','sig-policy@lists.apnic.net');> >> > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy >> > >> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy >> * >> _______________________________________________ >> sig-policy mailing list >> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','sig-policy@lists.apnic.net');> >> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy >> > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy mailing list > sig-policy@lists.apnic.net > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','sig-policy@lists.apnic.net');> > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > > -- -- Dean Pemberton Technical Policy Advisor InternetNZ +64 21 920 363 (mob) d...@internetnz.net.nz To promote the Internet's benefits and uses, and protect its potential.
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
