I'm sure Skeeve also thinks that organisations should be able to get all the IP addresses they might ever need all on day one. I'm sure he even knows a company who could arrange that for them.
Lets see where the community thinks this should go. It still sounds like unlimited ASNs for anyone who thinks they might like to have them. Great business for anyone clipping the ticket on the transaction. -- Dean Pemberton Technical Policy Advisor InternetNZ +64 21 920 363 (mob) d...@internetnz.net.nz To promote the Internet's benefits and uses, and protect its potential. On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Skeeve Stevens <ske...@v4now.com> wrote: > This is where the big different in philosophy is. > > I want to be able to choose to get an ASN and ready my network to be > multi-homed - 'at some point' > > Dean says do it with private ASN and then reconfigure your network when > you are ready. > > Frankly, I still think this is telling me how to plan the building of my > networks - and telling me when I should do the work. > > > ...Skeeve > > *Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker* > *v4Now - *an eintellego Networks service > ske...@v4now.com ; www.v4now.com > > Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve > > facebook.com/v4now ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau> > linkedin.com/in/skeeve > > twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com > > > IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Dean Pemberton <d...@internetnz.net.nz> > wrote: > >> It did say "immediate future". >> I would say that it seems reasonable that if you're claiming that >> you're going to multihome in the "immediate future" that you would >> know the ASNs with whom you were going to peer. >> >> If it was more of a "Well at some point we might want to multihome", >> then you might not know the ASN. But in those situations RFC1930 says >> that you should be using a private AS until such time as you are >> closer to peering. >> >> Dean >> -- >> Dean Pemberton >> >> Technical Policy Advisor >> InternetNZ >> +64 21 920 363 (mob) >> d...@internetnz.net.nz >> >> To promote the Internet's benefits and uses, and protect its potential. >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Aftab Siddiqui >> <aftab.siddi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Hi Guangliang, >> > >> >> >> >> The option "b" is acceptable. >> >> >> >> b. If an applicant can demonstrate a plan to be multihomed in >> >> immediate future, it is not a must they are physically multihomed >> >> at the time of submitting a request >> > >> > >> > But even then applicant has to provide the details of those ASN with >> whom >> > they may or may not multhome in future. right? >> > >> > Regards, >> > >> > Aftab A. Siddiqui >> > >> > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy >> > * >> > _______________________________________________ >> > sig-policy mailing list >> > sig-policy@lists.apnic.net >> > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy >> > >> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy >> * >> _______________________________________________ >> sig-policy mailing list >> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net >> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy >> > >
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
