Sure, but if you are going to be circumnavigating the filter for illegal
purposes, the illegality of actually doing the bypassing is academic.
 

----------------------------------------------
Myles Eftos
Mobile: +61-409-293-183

MadPilot Productions
URL: http://www.madpilot.com.au <http://www.madpilot.com.au/> 
Phone: +618-6424-8234
Fax: +618-9467-6289

Try our time tracking system: 88 Miles!
http://www.88miles.net <http://www.88miles.net/>  

 


  _____  

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Holmes a
Court
Sent: Sunday, 26 October 2008 22:25
To: [email protected]
Subject: [SiliconBeach] Re: ISP filtering


Just a thought, if the filter passes into use - wouldn't the government make
illegal any websites that have information on how to bypass the filter? Also
wouldnt the govt also make it illegal to spread information about this and
target individuals and corporations who do so?
 
This is obviously a flawed way of thinking, but given the flaws in the
thinking that has got the government to this point, it really wouldnt be a
suprise.
 
It would also be a logical extension that the using/creating of any
technology that bypasses the filter would also be made illegal. (Not
dissimilar to DMCA in the US). 
 
I know this directly effects my company and many other tech companies.

While im sure we all strongly agree with Gilmores law - "The internet
interprets censorship as damage and routes around it." - and that gives us
some confidence. - it seems pretty scary that our government might turn a
large percentage of its otherwise law abiding population into criminals.
 
The immediate question is how do you make Joe Public care? And, how do you
get mainstream media to care?
 
Maybe there is something to learn from the anonymous/anti-scientology
movement, maybe this is something anonymous could be steered to care about
if we targeted their channels. Anonymous delivered in both getting media
attention and simplifying the scientology message into something the public
is happy to talk about.
 
Either way im sure we are all on the same page that this filter must not be
passed into use - once this is in, we could speculate that the governement
would never give it up.
 
"One of the greatest delusions in the world is the hope that the evils in
this world are to be cured by legislation." - Thomas B. Reed 
 
"Once fully enslaved, no nation, state, city of this earth ever afterward
resumes its liberty." - Walt Whitman
 
 
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Pat Allan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:


Elias - love the ideas, definitely got some merit - the initial idea wasn't
mind though, I'm just echoing Mark Pesce: 
http://twitter.com/mpesce/status/974762216

The one issue I can see with using Iran (and China) as examples though is
that the Government repetitively states it's not like them. But definitely,
the government needs to be embarrassed and pressured into seeing how stupid
their idea is. Get the videos made, I'll definitely do my bit to promote
them.





-- 
Pat


On 26/10/2008, at 7:14 PM, Elias Bizannes wrote:


That's a brillaint idea Pat - showing how ineffective the controls would be,
in a vocal way :) 

I've got some contacts in Iran and they could help us broadcast how these
'repressed' people get away with things. It would be a good way to compare
the approach to an authoritarian government, whilst at the same time showing
how ineffective they are.

We could also  put together short clips having people explain how easy it is
to circumvent as well as working examples of exploitations of the holes.

Whilst we can make this content targeted at the public to create awareness,
I also (as I am sure others) got some labour hack mates, who can ensure that
our work is distributed to the right people within the party. And certainly,
I've got some Liberal hack mates who would love to get behind this for the
sake of creating a wedge issue.

Clearly, English doesn't work in the form of  letters and e-mails that we
have sent to these short-sighted, opportunistic, moronic arse-wipe
politicians. Maybe it's time we try another tactic: flat out embaressment,
with a touch of crowd sourcing and a tad of social media distribution. At
worst, we have a laugh and let the public know our industry is alive and
kicking.

Thoughts?


On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:49 PM, Pat Allan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:



It took me about six months to get a response to my first letter. The
second letter (as an email, since I wasn't in Aus) got a slightly
faster response (just under two months).

http://freelancing-gods.com/posts/internet_censorship_in_australia
http://freelancing-gods.com/posts/correspondance_on_censorship

Sometimes I consider going to harrass Conroy in person (since he's a
Victorian senator), but I wonder if that's just a waste of time
anyway, given his attitude as reported by the media. And whether he'd
bother responding to an appointment is another matter. Still, it might
result in a somewhat more human response than the bullshit spin he's
responding with to the media.

I'm not sure what we can do as a community - seems several of us are
writing to him, and that's not (visibly) getting us anywhere. ISP
employees' opinions don't seem to carry much weight either. If it gets
rolled out (although the trial results give me hope it's just not
feasible enough even for Conroy to go through with it), then I guess
we do what we can to publicise how easy it is to circumvent? I'm
seeing a lot of pissed off tweets lately about the issue... but
getting a Government to drop a policy they've been so solidly behind
is far from easy.

Still, suggestions for action welcome :)

--
Pat


On 26/10/2008, at 6:07 PM, Gary Barber wrote:

>
> At least you got a response, I have yet to get that for any of the
> three
> emails I have sent over the previous months and several phone calls.
>
> --
> Gary Barber
> Freelance User Interaction Designer/ Information Architect
>
> Web: radharc.com.au <http://radharc.com.au/> 
> blog: manwithnoblog.com <http://manwithnoblog.com/> 
>
>
>
> Elias Bizannes wrote:
>> This issue really, really, really pisses me off.
>>
http://www.smh.com.au/news/technology/biztech/how-government-tried-to-gag-ce
nsor-critics/2008/10/23/1224351430987.html
>>
>> I've already written to the minister, and got a lame response:
>> http://liako.biz/2008/07/internet-censorship-in-australia/
>>
>> What's the most effective thing we can do as a community? Surely
>> something is better than ignoring it...
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> >








-- 
Elias Bizannes
http://liako.biz <http://liako.biz/> 












--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Silicon Beach Australia" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to