True but no political party would want to incur the wrath of a lobby right? I mean unless the government has a benefit (eg votes from the public and/or votes from the lobbies), it wouldnt give a damn about filtering (or any other policy for that matter right? This is just my elementary political knowledge talking.
Cheers Sri On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Sjors Provoost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Sriram Panyam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I was wondering if we are overlooking corporations? What does > corporate > > australia (CA) gain or loose (monetarily ofcourse) from the filtering? > Why > > is there silence from CA? How about publishing/emphasising the > > economic/monetary effects of the filtering on both corporates as well as > > individuals (80% reduction and hence a much lower value for money being > the > > most obvious one)? > > > > Cheers > > Sri > > That might actually backfire, because it would seem 'evil corporates' > are behind us and 'evil corporates' don't care about our children. > Needless to say, employees of such corporates don't have children... > > Then again, they do know how to lobby properly. > > Sjors > > > > -- Blog: http://panyam.wordpress.com URL: http://www.geocities.com/spany_1 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Silicon Beach Australia" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
