What if you laid the solar cells + batteries beside or in between the tracks on 
the big hills and could pick up a charge when you needed it? 


Mike Nicholls
Elders Real Estate Mosman
0411 222. 551
Follow me on Twiiter.com/Mikenicholls88


Sent from my iPhone

On 31/01/2011, at 8:46 PM, David Lyon <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yep,
> 
> That maths is more or less correct. However I'm not advocating something that
> will convey 500 passengers. Its a somewhat smaller number.
> 
> One of the problems that Australia has with the High-Speed-Train is that there
> won't be 500 passengers per service. That makes the whole conventional HST
> propositions unviable. The Solar Train has less passengers, but charges more.
> 
> The number that I am working with is about 20-40 passengers. You can use your
> maths to calculate how long the train will be.
> 
> With 40 passengers paying $150 per ticket (lets use 35) it comes to $5350 trip
> multiplied by two (up and down) then in the afternoon (x2) = $21,000 per day
> between Canberra and Sydney.
> 
> For 360 days, that is a revenue of $7,560,000 per year. Each Train will cost
> $2.5M to build. We'll need about six to eight. Time to pay back the money will
> be about four years.
> 
> Yes, there is a polluting and more uncomfortable bus service that runs for 
> $15-35
> on the same leg. 
> 
> David
> 
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Clifford Heath <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> David,
> 
> Perhaps a small example would outline my concern.
> 
> Supposing we had magical materials which weigh nothing, so we can disregard
> the mass of the train and just consider the payload. Beginning with a single 
> person
> then, say 100Kg, travelling at 100km/hr. Railways routinely climb slopes up 
> to 1 in
> 11. Normally less, but 1 in 11 is a common maximum sustained climb.
> 
> The power required for this hypothetical train to lift this person at this 
> rate is 2.5KW,
> since they're rising 2.5m/s, with a weight of 970N.
> 
> Now if this train has a solar cell with high efficiency, say generously 18%, 
> and it is
> in full noonday sun with the cells on the optimum angle, they make about 
> 180W/m^2.
> 
> That requires 14 square metres of solar cell, per person. With a weightless 
> train,
> zero friction or drag, at noonday, with the cells angled correctly.
> 
> Start factoring in the overheads, and you quickly reach a required 200m^2 per
> person. Carry 500 passengers, and a 5 metre-wide train would need to be 20km
> long, or one passenger every 40m of train length. This just *not* a feasible 
> size for
> a train. Sure, this is a peak load while climbing a hill, and you'd be able 
> to serve
> that load from batteries for some duration, but those 500 people and a train 
> of
> comparable weight are still going to need 2.5MW to climb that hill.
> 
> I could go on... there are a hundred other potential failures in this 
> proposal, but...
> do you see why I'm skeptical?
> 
> Clifford Heath.
> 
> 
> On 30/01/2011, at 3:55 PM, David Lyon wrote:
> 
>> Hi Clifford,
>> 
>> I can give a preview yes, but not the whole mathematical equation. General 
>> maths
>> are ok.there are a few sensitive IP design solutions that I'm not going into.
>> 
>> Firstly, my van in my garage has 7 seats, a 2 litre 90hp petrol motor. Its 
>> good for
>> 100kmh on the road. It weighs about 1700kg. Total weight for that with all 
>> people
>> is therefore about 2400kg.
>> 
>> In the old days, trains many trains were actually made from wood and had 
>> wooden
>> wheels. That kept the weight down. For 20 people we are aiming with aluminium
>> and aluminium honeycomb to get something for 900kg. Think what an aluminium
>> 'tinny' boat weighs - four people can go in one of those and I've seen many 
>> that
>> weigh as little as 100kg. Think what a cessna or light plane weighs and how 
>> they
>> are constructed.
>> 
>> To carry 20 people, you need about 150kw to get up to speed. You're going to
> 
>> need enough solar cells to generate that amount of power in a period of six 
>> hours
>> to go 300km and batteries to hold the charge.
>> 
>> Once the train is moving, it needs less power to keep going. When it is 
>> running
>> downhill it is recharging the batteries (regenerative).
> 
>> 
>> Also, forget steel wheels. Think of something like mag-alloy or carbon fibre.
>> 
>> "Conventional" trains, on the other hand, are 8000kg per carriage and have 
>> four
>> 150kw motors. Thats just too heavy to go and attach solar cells to and 
>> expect it
> 
>> to work.
>> 
>> There's a whole lot of advances in battery technology like Lithium Ion 
>> Polymer
>> and advances in solar cells that mean the surrounding technology is much 
>> moved
>> on from where it was 5 years ago.
>> 
>> It's possible to get people moving along a track with solar cells..
>> 
>> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Clifford Heath <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> On 30/01/2011, at 10:43 AM, David Lyon wrote:
>> I'm having trouble even getting a VC meeting with my Solar Train. I'm being 
>> told "Since
>> no such technology exists in the market.. (we have no time to even listen to 
>> a pitch)"
>> Train speeds in Australia are still 80kmh on average which is the same
>> average speed as what you used to get in the late 19th century.
>> If I can get an order for a full train, each train will be $2.5M so whilst 
>> there is some risk
>> there is also some potential to do things on the big scale working from a 
>> small base.
>> 
>> David,
> 
>> 
>> I'm not sure the numbers add up. Can you go through some of the
>> arithmetic concerning the actual energy consumption and requirements
>> of such a train? A lot of the ideas you've touted here seem to me to be
>> a bit suspect in this department. A confident and competent mathematical
>> presentation of the energy budgets would go a long way to convince me
>> (and perhaps, VCs) that you know what you're talking about.
> 
>> 
>> Clifford Heath.
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
> 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Silicon Beach 
>> Australia mailing list.
>> 
>> Guidelines on discussion: 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia/msg/351e183e1303508d?hl=en%3Fhl%3Den
>> 
>> No lurkers! It is expected that you introduce yourself.
>> 
>> To post to this group, send email to
>> [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia?hl=en?hl=en
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Silicon Beach 
>> Australia mailing list.
>> 
>> Guidelines on discussion: 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia/msg/351e183e1303508d?hl=en%3Fhl%3Den
>> 
>> No lurkers! It is expected that you introduce yourself.
>> 
>> To post to this group, send email to
>> [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia?hl=en?hl=en
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Silicon Beach 
> Australia mailing list.
>  
> Guidelines on discussion: 
> http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia/msg/351e183e1303508d?hl=en%3Fhl%3Den
>  
> No lurkers! It is expected that you introduce yourself.
>  
> To post to this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia?hl=en?hl=en
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Silicon Beach 
> Australia mailing list.
>  
> Guidelines on discussion: 
> http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia/msg/351e183e1303508d?hl=en%3Fhl%3Den
>  
> No lurkers! It is expected that you introduce yourself.
>  
> To post to this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia?hl=en?hl=en

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Silicon Beach 
Australia mailing list.

Guidelines on discussion: 
http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia/msg/351e183e1303508d?hl=en%3Fhl%3Den

No lurkers! It is expected that you introduce yourself.

To post to this group, send email to
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia?hl=en?hl=en

Reply via email to