Exactly.

The best batteries are Lithium Ion Polymer. However I'm testing with Nimh
which
are the same as used in the Prius. Batteries add a huge safety layer
(tunnels +
inclines + accelerating).

On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Mike Nicholls <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> What if you laid the solar cells + batteries beside or in between the
> tracks on the big hills and could pick up a charge when you needed it?
>
>
> Mike Nicholls
> Elders Real Estate Mosman
> 0411 222. 551
> Follow me on <http://Twiiter.com/Mikenicholls88>Twiiter.com/Mikenicholls88
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 31/01/2011, at 8:46 PM, David Lyon <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Yep,
>
> That maths is more or less correct. However I'm not advocating something
> that
> will convey 500 passengers. Its a somewhat smaller number.
>
> One of the problems that Australia has with the High-Speed-Train is that
> there
> won't be 500 passengers per service. That makes the whole conventional HST
> propositions unviable. The Solar Train has less passengers, but charges
> more.
>
> The number that I am working with is about 20-40 passengers. You can use
> your
> maths to calculate how long the train will be.
>
> With 40 passengers paying $150 per ticket (lets use 35) it comes to $5350
> trip
> multiplied by two (up and down) then in the afternoon (x2) = $21,000 per
> day
> between Canberra and Sydney.
>
> For 360 days, that is a revenue of $7,560,000 per year. Each Train will
> cost
> $2.5M to build. We'll need about six to eight. Time to pay back the money
> will
> be about four years.
>
> Yes, there is a polluting and more uncomfortable bus service that runs for
> $15-35
> on the same leg.
>
> David
>
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Clifford Heath <<[email protected]>
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> David,
>>
>> Perhaps a small example would outline my concern.
>>
>> Supposing we had magical materials which weigh nothing, so we can
>> disregard
>> the mass of the train and just consider the payload. Beginning with a
>> single person
>> then, say 100Kg, travelling at 100km/hr. Railways routinely climb slopes
>> up to 1 in
>> 11. Normally less, but 1 in 11 is a common maximum sustained climb.
>>
>> The power required for this hypothetical train to lift this person at this
>> rate is 2.5KW,
>> since they're rising 2.5m/s, with a weight of 970N.
>>
>> Now if this train has a solar cell with high efficiency, say generously
>> 18%, and it is
>> in full noonday sun with the cells on the optimum angle, they make about
>> 180W/m^2.
>>
>> That requires 14 square metres of solar cell, per person. With a
>> weightless train,
>> zero friction or drag, at noonday, with the cells angled correctly.
>>
>> Start factoring in the overheads, and you quickly reach a required 200m^2
>> per
>> person. Carry 500 passengers, and a 5 metre-wide train would need to be
>> 20km
>> long, or one passenger every 40m of train length. This just *not* a
>> feasible size for
>> a train. Sure, this is a peak load while climbing a hill, and you'd be
>> able to serve
>> that load from batteries for some duration, but those 500 people and a
>> train of
>> comparable weight are still going to need 2.5MW to climb that hill.
>>
>> I could go on... there are a hundred other potential failures in this
>> proposal, but...
>> do you see why I'm skeptical?
>>
>> Clifford Heath.
>>
>>
>> On 30/01/2011, at 3:55 PM, David Lyon wrote:
>>
>> Hi Clifford,
>>
>>
>> I can give a preview yes, but not the whole mathematical equation. General
>> maths
>>
>> are ok.there are a few sensitive IP design solutions that I'm not going
>> into.
>>
>>
>> Firstly, my van in my garage has 7 seats, a 2 litre 90hp petrol motor. Its
>> good for
>>
>> 100kmh on the road. It weighs about 1700kg. Total weight for that with all
>> people
>>
>> is therefore about 2400kg.
>>
>>
>> In the old days, trains many trains were actually made from wood and had
>> wooden
>>
>> wheels. That kept the weight down. For 20 people we are aiming with
>> aluminium
>>
>> and aluminium honeycomb to get something for 900kg. Think what an
>> aluminium
>>
>> 'tinny' boat weighs - four people can go in one of those and I've seen
>> many that
>>
>> weigh as little as 100kg. Think what a cessna or light plane weighs and
>> how they
>>
>> are constructed.
>>
>>
>> To carry 20 people, you need about 150kw to get up to speed. You're going
>> to
>>
>> need enough solar cells to generate that amount of power in a period of
>> six hours
>>
>> to go 300km and batteries to hold the charge.
>>
>>
>> Once the train is moving, it needs less power to keep going. When it is
>> running
>>
>> downhill it is recharging the batteries (regenerative).
>>
>>
>> Also, forget steel wheels. Think of something like mag-alloy or carbon
>> fibre.
>>
>>
>> "Conventional" trains, on the other hand, are 8000kg per carriage and have
>> four
>>
>> 150kw motors. Thats just too heavy to go and attach solar cells to and
>> expect it
>>
>> to work.
>>
>>
>> There's a whole lot of advances in battery technology like Lithium Ion
>> Polymer
>>
>> and advances in solar cells that mean the surrounding technology is much
>> moved
>>
>> on from where it was 5 years ago.
>>
>>
>> It's possible to get people moving along a track with solar cells..
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Clifford Heath <<[email protected]>
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On 30/01/2011, at 10:43 AM, David Lyon wrote:
>>
>> I'm having trouble even getting a VC meeting with my Solar Train. I'm
>> being told "Since
>>
>> no such technology exists in the market.. (we have no time to even listen
>> to a pitch)"
>>
>> Train speeds in Australia are still 80kmh on average which is the same
>>
>> average speed as what you used to get in the late 19th century.
>>
>> If I can get an order for a full train, each train will be $2.5M so whilst
>> there is some risk
>>
>> there is also some potential to do things on the big scale working from a
>> small base.
>>
>>
>> David,
>>
>>
>> I'm not sure the numbers add up. Can you go through some of the
>>
>> arithmetic concerning the actual energy consumption and requirements
>>
>> of such a train? A lot of the ideas you've touted here seem to me to be
>>
>> a bit suspect in this department. A confident and competent mathematical
>>
>> presentation of the energy budgets would go a long way to convince me
>>
>> (and perhaps, VCs) that you know what you're talking about.
>>
>>
>> Clifford Heath.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Silicon Beach
>> Australia mailing list.
>>
>>
>> Guidelines on discussion:
>> <http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia/msg/351e183e1303508d?hl=en%3Fhl%3Den>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia/msg/351e183e1303508d?hl=en%3Fhl%3Den
>>
>>
>> No lurkers! It is expected that you introduce yourself.
>>
>>
>> To post to this group, send email to
>>
>> <[email protected]>
>> [email protected]
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>
>> <silicon-beach-australia%[email protected]>
>> [email protected]
>>
>> For more options, visit this group at
>>
>> <http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia?hl=en?hl=en>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia?hl=en?hl=en
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Silicon Beach
>> Australia mailing list.
>>
>>
>> Guidelines on discussion:
>> <http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia/msg/351e183e1303508d?hl=en%3Fhl%3Den>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia/msg/351e183e1303508d?hl=en%3Fhl%3Den
>>
>>
>> No lurkers! It is expected that you introduce yourself.
>>
>>
>> To post to this group, send email to
>>
>> <[email protected]>
>> [email protected]
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>
>> <silicon-beach-australia%[email protected]>
>> [email protected]
>>
>> For more options, visit this group at
>>
>> <http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia?hl=en?hl=en>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia?hl=en?hl=en
>>
>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Silicon Beach
>> Australia mailing list.
>>
>> Guidelines on discussion:
>> <http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia/msg/351e183e1303508d?hl=en%3Fhl%3Den>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia/msg/351e183e1303508d?hl=en%3Fhl%3Den
>>
>> No lurkers! It is expected that you introduce yourself.
>>
>> To post to this group, send email to
>>  <[email protected]>
>> [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>  <silicon-beach-australia%[email protected]>
>> [email protected]
>> For more options, visit this group at
>>  <http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia?hl=en?hl=en>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia?hl=en?hl=en
>>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Silicon Beach
> Australia mailing list.
>
> Guidelines on discussion:
> <http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia/msg/351e183e1303508d?hl=en%3Fhl%3Den>
> http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia/msg/351e183e1303508d?hl=en%3Fhl%3Den
>
> No lurkers! It is expected that you introduce yourself.
>
> To post to this group, send email to
>  <[email protected]>
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>  <[email protected]>
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
>  <http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia?hl=en?hl=en>
> http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia?hl=en?hl=en
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Silicon Beach
> Australia mailing list.
>
> Guidelines on discussion:
> http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia/msg/351e183e1303508d?hl=en%3Fhl%3Den
>
> No lurkers! It is expected that you introduce yourself.
>
> To post to this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<silicon-beach-australia%[email protected]>
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia?hl=en?hl=en
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Silicon Beach 
Australia mailing list.

Guidelines on discussion: 
http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia/msg/351e183e1303508d?hl=en%3Fhl%3Den

No lurkers! It is expected that you introduce yourself.

To post to this group, send email to
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia?hl=en?hl=en

Reply via email to