On 06/11/2013, at 6:58 PM, Corey Baines <coreyba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> p.s. I would like to keep this discussion constructive and clean, Did I say anything that was unclean? I'm more than willing to be constructive, and your ideas are not without merit, but there are several ways in which the laws of physics will need to be changed. Regarding physics: 1) What MIP/Watt figure is needed for your device to succeed? (Hint: about 100x current technology is capable of) 2) How many MBPS do you need to "connect wirelessly to a display"? (Hint: about 10,000x NFC communications is capable of). These kinds of questions require someone who has the basic engineering insight to be able to answer. If you don't know how to answer these questions, you aren't at the starting gate yet. And that's not the worst of your problems. You want to disrupt a $T business, with no capital? Good luck with that. Clifford Heath. > Hi Clifford, > Thanks for your comment, now as like last time you've given me plenty to > think about. > But I'd like to make clear my vision for Spectrul's future and more > importantly the possibilities a Spectrul based device will empower. Today > most mobile devices have a very similar if not (in some respects) an exact > same spec sheet as most household computers, and what do we use them for. > Studies show that in the case of android, consumers use them as telephones > only, and in the case of iOS, consumers while mainly using them to place > calls, increasingly use them to play games, listen to music, and browse the > internet. I believe these stats in regards android and iOS are backed up by > the fact that the majority of android devices sold are cheap, limited and > small phones, designed to take and place calls only. But forgetting that why > are these devices (in particular android) still really only used for phone > calls and light gaming? This is because the operating systems are overly > complex and have never been expanded outside the confining definition of a > smartphone. > > Spectrul will redefine that definition, allowing all Spectrul installed > smartphones to connect wirelessly to an external monitor, keyboard, mouse, or > controller. I am calling this connection Smartplay and it is based of a group > of open source technologies including, Beacon, Alljoyn, and NFC. Once > connected Spectrul is no longer a phone but a full computer, a full console, > a full laptop and a replacement for many technologies into the future. As > said in my first post, imagine taking a photo with Spectrul and then walking > up to your desk as the monitor, keyboard and mouse connect automatically > thanks to both beacon and alljoyn and now you can edit though photos in a > full desktop app. A full quality photo, no shrinking the file, waiting for it > to sync or worst yet losing it during that sync. > > On why the major players aren’t doing anything like Spectrul, its the same as > IBM back in the personal computer days. Inertia stops major innovation, sure > there are major thinks inside these companies, but there is no reason to > release them yet. Look at Ouya in the US. They started on Kickstarter with > very little money (sourced: Julie Urhman), with a radical almost impossible > idea. What happened was they were funded and have since secured even more > funding but better still that sent ripples through the entire industry. > > In regards the Billion dollar budget, yes i know that its a massive project > like a lot of startups which is why i am being conservative and working with > open source technologies such as Alljoyn, android, Beacon, and intellij. The > first release will be lean to show what Spectrul is all about and capable of > becoming. Over time Spectrul will be refined and perfected, and there will be > funding sessions not only at the beginning of that journey but along the way > as well. > > p.s. I would like to keep this discussion constructive and clean, if at all > possible. I know you don't share my vision of Spectrul, if the above didn't > change your mind, but please keep the criticism constructive about about > Spectrul. > > Regards, Corey > > -- > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Silicon Beach > Australia mailing list. Vist http://siliconbeachaustralia.org for more > > Forum rules > 1) No lurkers! It is expected that you introduce yourself. > 2) No jobs postings. You can use http://siliconbeachaustralia.org/jobs > > > To post to this group, send email to > silicon-beach-australia@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > silicon-beach-australia+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia?hl=en?hl=en > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Silicon Beach Australia" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to silicon-beach-australia+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Silicon Beach Australia mailing list. Vist http://siliconbeachaustralia.org for more Forum rules 1) No lurkers! It is expected that you introduce yourself. 2) No jobs postings. You can use http://siliconbeachaustralia.org/jobs To post to this group, send email to silicon-beach-australia@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to silicon-beach-australia+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia?hl=en?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Silicon Beach Australia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to silicon-beach-australia+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
