I'm not sure about testing a product with other variables, such as a protein. If we do this, we will need to make two tests--the second with the exact silver concentration at 40 ppm and .001 micron size. Otherwise, we won't know what the silver itself is doing. (i.e., does the protein have any enhancing factor to the silver?)
I once used a silver which had an natural, active ingredient added to it (electron-giver) that enhanced the action of the silver in killing pathogens--it was the fastest germ killer tested at a university. So unless we have the funds to do two studies, it may be wiser to test a pure colloidal silver solution. If you go commercial, I would select a brand that has a reputation for giving great results, of a known concentration and size, and whose concentration (same batch) can also verified at 2 or 3 independent laboratories. But I like the idea of testing a dependable, reproducible home-made colloidal silver generator, which is more useful for most of us. Can someone do a SURVEY of the dependable home generators being used by the group? Or search the Web for any comparison studies on home generators? One final thing in testing--Please choose a testing facility that is honest (not infiltrated by NewWorldOrder who often sabotages health experiments). Regards, Joyce On Sat, 11 Jul 1998, MYCA, INC. wrote: > If you decide to go with a commercially prepared cs,I will be happy to donate > a > 4oz. bottle of the product I distribute[COLL/AG-40,MILD SILVER PROTEIN,@40PPM > and .001 microns in size,color-golden].Just let me know and I will ship it > whereever you would like. > HAVE AN UNBELIEVABLE DAY > ARNIE FARBER > > bjs1779 wrote: > > > > Here's a thought, if you go over the $200 limit why not donate the > > > excess to Jim Einert to help him cover the cost of his camera for his > > > microscope. I'm sure he'll be putting that camera to good use and helping > > > the CS croud. > > > Take Care > > > > > > Reid > > > > EXCELLENT idea Reid! In fact I've had some reservations about the test > > because > > I don't know what CS is going to be tested. It seems most of the group > > here is making their own CS. So to me, since there has been studies > > already on commercially prepared CS, a STANDARD home-brew that is > > as close to what everyone is making should be the likely candidate. > > The only problem I don't know is, does the homemade stuff stay > > effective long enough in order to get an accurate analysis? > > bjs > > > > -- > > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > > > > To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: > > silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com > > with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the subject: line. > > > > To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com > > > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@id.net> > > > > > -- > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > > To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: > silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com > with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the subject: line. > > To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@id.net> > > -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the subject: line. To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@id.net>
