Hey Carol Ann. My guess is that he knows better than to take the shit as well!!! Kurt
Carol Ann <saffiresk...@yahoo.com> wrote: Hi Kurt ~ Glad you caught the "good" doctor reference. :) It was actually tongue in cheek comment. But, the reality cannot be lost or overlooked in that generally, people see him as the premier authority and innovator. Big pharma, like the designer industry is not stupid when it comes hawking products via generation association / name recognition. Ya wanna sell a SUV with all the bells and whistles to a hip hopper, your not gonna use the late Bob Barker as a spokesperson. I figure Jarvic must own huge sums of Lipitor stock and the press lately, has not been all that good. Jarvic is an exemplary demonstration of an economic system functioning at its best and wading through their dis-info and profit inspired cesspool swamps are difficult. Lets face it. "good" is really a word which becomes a matter of objective or subjective perspective. For big pharma's agenda, Jarvic is good. Very good. Otherwise, I completely agree with your engineering assessments. :) Kurt Milkowski <kurt.milkow...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: Hey Carol Ann, Great piece of writing here. The only things I will disagree with is the median age extension and the "good' Doctor Jarvic. Regards, Carol Ann ~ The only thing that is different is how you think.. http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/archivepix.html --------------------------------- Don't let your dream ride pass you by. Make it a reality with Yahoo! Autos.