Hi John, My post may have come across as indifferent and more callus than intended. Having been to some of what are considered among the most premier health centers in the US was a real catalyst for me. If I had any semblance of being a cynic or skeptic before my personal experiences regarding the "health care" system, I roam among the vigilante genesis now. I actually have come to the point where I laugh at the term "health care". It is a misnomer. The question few really ask when initially seeking it is what kind of health care. Good, bad, indifferent.
What I conveyed was my perspective on how human beings are treated by those they trust and pay monetarily, physically and emotionally, to protect public health. Given what I know now, I would NEVER have given consent to inoculate any of my children merely on a precautionary, status quo basis. John Plumridge <bollyb...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: My children are 4 and 6 , have had no vaccinations whatsoever, are amongst the most healthy. Whatever that may mean to you. They may yet get struck down, I'll report back in twenty years or so. They could be disease carriers infecting everyone else, and not showing it themselves. BUt they aren't carrying the new forms yet to be born. And if you belive in your vaccinations, you have no cause to worry! JOhn --On 13 October 2007 03:34:53 -0700 Carol Ann wrote: > I look at the vaccine programs.....logically, with practicality and > with no emotions...other than to say I think I understand why they exist > and are sanctioned and promoted. Seeding. > > Fact. There is a certain amount of longevity expected from any commodity. > Human beings included. All units of production, especially the non > organic are designed, more often than not, with varying degrees of > built-in functional obsolescence. So as to require maintenance or > replacement. Modern society has rapidly become technically advanced. We > now definitively know the world is not flat, that earth is not the center > of the universe, and we no longer use leeches as a matter of routine for > every medical diagnosis. The median age/life has been extended as a > result. > > All societies exist in an economic vacuum with some thriving better than > others -each creating its own standards. Some Indigenous isolated > societies want nothing to do with modern civilizations trappings, some > imperialistic cultures believe that industry is prosperous and thus > imperative and mandatory. > > Duality. From the cradle to the grave, in modernized countries > especially, the carbon unit, not unlike a crop (human) is cultivated for > highest production, thus maximum economic profits. The process begins at > birth with immunizations followed with those yearly "check ups", at least > until adulthood where they begin to wane. During the prime of life > (20's-40's) the unit produces the greatest benefits, ie. pays the > greatest taxes, insurance, has expendable surplus income and creates > prodigies (more working carbon units) for the benefit of all. The > individual family units thrive on emotion and govts capitalize on that > emotion which they fuel with the fear.....of loss. > > As the unit ages (50's onward) naturally, it produces less and begins > to deteriorate. However, at this juncture its capacity is still > abundant, the only thing that has changed is its production profile. It > still generates tremendous profits and our medical system and those > dependent upon it by association are the greatest benefactors. I notice > that the good Dr. Jarvik is shamelessly pushing Lipitor, in his old age, > in television commercials. > > Essentially, the decision, or option to be a disease carrier or not is > one area that the government would like to seize and reign complete over. > The government supposedly is created and exists for the people. In > actuality, unless people can recite how govt altruistically exists for > the people vs the perpetuity of the economic systems it governs, which > are the main contributors to its longevity, vaccines in my opinion, have > become intentionally designed processes of built-in economic > obsolescence. > > My granddaughter is almost 2 and has not received the across the board, > one shot suits all garden variety vaccinations. And I would lie or > forge all necessary papers, if necessary, to keep her brain free of > mercury, thermisol and only the pharma companies know what viruses. > Ain't nobody, has the right to diminish or rob her of her birth rights by > inoculating her to protect someone else's economic status. > > > > > > > Deborah Gerard wrote: > > I see your point Ode..BUT it sure doesn't give whoever is producing > these vaccines the right to put mercury and/or anyother extremely harmful > additive to these vaccines that are causing havoc in the unsuspecticing, > trusting publics, bodies.....debbie > > Ode Coyote wrote: > > Regardless of unproven "bullshit", Does any transport person have the > right to be a disease carrier? > > > > > > > Regards, Carol Ann ~ The only thing that is different is how you think.. > http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/archivepix.html > > > __________________________________________________ > Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join Yahoo!'s user > panel and lay it on us. -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down... List maintainer: Mike Devour Regards, Carol Ann ~ The only thing that is different is how you think.. http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/archivepix.html --------------------------------- Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, photos & more.
