--On 16 October 2007 07:38:00 -0400 Ode Coyote <odecoy...@alltel.net> wrote:
Silver IS being rediscovered in more effective forms as nano-technology
and ion exchange technology are better understood though progression of
discovery.
You haven't noticed how many products it's being used in lately?
The list is a long one.
Even the "Pharm" is catching on.
That was the example hinted at for my suggestion of rediscovery as opposed
to progressive discovery.
As of around 5 years ago, a pharm research department head friend of mine
was working on metallic nano particles.
That's all he would say.
Might have been touched off by a CS generator gift a year earlier.
I don't know, but he got pretty quiet after that.
They aren't all "turkeys" , you know.
You'd be surprised at how 'cool' some of these guys are, just under the
lab coats, nearly incomprehensible back deck barbecue party
conversations and triple PHD exteriors.
I'll bet my boots they got their ideas from alternative/complimentary users
like people on this list, and some press reports of the fact, plus the
problems of mms and the soloution of silver offered by certain companies
using silver for linings in long-life products.
What medical reseachers study is all politically driven. 'Cool' I'm sure
phd students are - they study cool and wear it like a uniform. Speak cool,
I don't think so...barbecue parity conversation isn't so free where you
hear the name of university colleges.. They are usually five years behind
free thinkers who also try to solve imaginary problems.
Of course some are naturally intelligent, and wear what they like in a
nice way, like shirts instead of T-shirts. It is true, I suppose, phd
students, though dressed uninterestingly, are beginning to break a little
from student conformity, into adult conformity.
But Cool is dead now. The re-birth of cool, would be the re-emergence of
the unpaid politically-free 'Gentleman Scholar'. Like yourself. Couldn't
be less interested in nano-technology, or anything to do with microscopes
myself. Another disaster for the human race, before we just live.
Seriously unnecessary toys for people who seriously insist on missing
things with the scope of intelligence and the human eye. <grin>
JOhn.
Ode
At 07:55 PM 10/15/2007 +0100, you wrote:
Discovery as a progression:
why not a rediscovery, as in the case of silver, which was forgotten
largely, since Roman and Persian times?
If true, then this procession is more like a a dance troupe on their way
back fro the pub doing a Micahael Jackson impersonation.
JOhn
--On 15 October 2007 11:06:04 -0400 Ode Coyote <odecoy...@alltel.net>
wrote:
At 08:12 PM 10/12/2007 -0700, you wrote:
I see your point Ode..BUT it sure doesn't give whoever is producing
these vaccines the right to put mercury and/or anyother extremely
harmful additive to these vaccines that are causing havoc in the
unsuspecticing, trusting publics, bodies.....debbie
## No disagreement there...and they have stopped doing that now that the
## issue has been studied some and found, even though the evidence
## doesn't add up in the face of other more prevalent factors as relates
## to the effects of "mercury" in nervous system 'development'...it's
## still not a great idea to add to the environmental load and better
## ways to preserve a vaccine now exist that may not have before.
ie: It's not the "vaccine" so much as it's the preservative IN the
vaccine.
And that amount of mercury has no effects on adults over and above the
"now normal" much higher levels of environmental mercury.
And even if that amount of mercury isn't "the" problem, adding that to
other "unavoidable" sources can be avoided...and IS being avoided as of
a couple of years ago...just on "general principle", just in case and
no good reason not to since the development of better preservatives.
Discovery, is and always has been, a progression...or...the Romans had
no right to use lead plumbing and radioactive glaze was put on
FiestaWare for the express purpose of giving people cancer.
PS Radium glaze was discontinued, not because it "gave" people cancer,
but because it "possibly" could and wasn't necessary. It *was* used
because there *was* no known reason not to use it, and it was pretty.
Was, isn't is. Known and even suspected, does not predate, not known.
Ode
Ode
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database:
269.14.10/1070 - Release Date: 10/14/2007 9:22 AM
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...
List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database:
269.14.12/1072 - Release Date: 10/15/2007 5:55 PM
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database:
269.14.12/1072 - Release Date: 10/15/2007 5:55 PM
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database:
269.14.12/1072 - Release Date: 10/15/2007 5:55 PM
