Infectious disease as a weapon is a fact.
Anthrax comes in an arosol form now!
In fact, I am a living example of a witness being disabled by targeted
infection.
MRSA is more common now. I have several friends who have contracted it in
hospitals.
In the most general terms, biological warfare is a reality we all have to
live with. I factor that in to the vaccine talks. But there is a clear over
riding issue of safe environment. If you don't have a black light or high
density negative ions and are concerned about your personal politics you are
behind the times.
=z=
Simon Jester <tansta...@libertytrek.org> wrote:
> I've heard discussions about what would be done in various
> hypothetical cases. Here's one: a boarding school full of kids has to
> be quarantined because one or more of them suddenly develops
> something like Ebola.
First false premise: people don't just 'develop' something like Ebola.
> As soon as quarantine is declared, hordes of parents, some armed,
> descend on the school determined to get their kids out,
I'd be one of them... since ebola is an ENGINEERED virus, why would I
want to leave my child's destiny in the hands of the same people (in
essence) who are responsible for the situation in the first place?
One alternative that I might be willing to put up with instead of seeing
how many jack-boots I could take with me would be for 'them' to allow us
parents to take our children HOME, and then imprison us there.
Another alternative I might consider is if they let me bring all of my
'stuff' with me and join my child(ren) in quarantine...
> and to hell with anyone else, the
No... to hell with the people who engineered these super-bugs.
> In such a scenario, how would one respond? I'd say the everyone in
> the boarding school would have to be quarantined and that the angry
> parents would have to be disarmed.
Read: murdered.
> I imagine others would say otherwise. Other very tough calls involve
> efforts to stop fetal alcohol syndrome by imprisoning irremediably
> alcoholic mothers during pregnancy. It would be interesting to hear
> some reasoned opinions about the broader issue of control.
It is called fascism - and I will fight it and anyone who tries to force
it down my throat to the death. And I will fight anyone who advocates it
'for the good of the children' or 'to protect me from myself' with
words, as long as that is all they are using.
The fact is, life is sometimes tragic, and SHIT HAPPENS.
I'd much rather live in a free society, where people are free to live
their lives, and MAKE THEIR OWN MISTAKES (and have to suffer the
consequences of them), rather than some controlled society where the
myth of 'safety' is the over-riding concern, and people abdicate their
personal responsibility for determining what is and is not safe to some
petty tyrant wanna-be's who are more than happy to do it for them.
> As for the hypothetical question below,
Excuse me, but there's absolutely nothing 'hypothetical' about it.
> I think the problem may be that immunizations are not 100% effective
> for everyone over all of a lifetime, and even advocates admit that.
Actually, the more correct wording would be:
Immunizations are not 100% INeffective for everyone over all of a
lifetime, and more and more former advocates are admitting this every day.
> The game plan is to keep infectivity low, I think.
The game plan SHOULD be to:
1. DESTROY the stranglehold that the fascist-medical-pharmaceutical
system has on the treatment of disease,
2. DESTROY the stranglehold that the fascist system has on the education
of our children, and go back to the basics - teach them reading,
writing, arithmetic, and most of all the ability to think for themselves.
3. DESTROY the stranglehold that this fascist government has on our
agricultural system, and provide incentives for farmers to use
traditional techniques - like letting the laand lie fallow, the use of
powerful cover crops like hemp to regenerate the soil and resotore it to
its natural, health-giving state
4. Provide incentives in the form of tax breaks to doctors, teaching
hospitals, etc to start studying HEALTH, instead of disease
5. Provide incentives in the form of tax breaks for insurance companies
to pay for alternative services - and while doing so, to begin compiling
statistics on what modalities are more effectiove for which condition
These are just off the top of my head... and there are many more things
that could be done - that would not cost a bloody cent (as far as tax
dollars are concerned)...
> I'm no expert.
That is obvious... but neither am I... which is obvious too...
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...
List maintainer: Mike Devour
=z=
The novelist, journalist and psychologist
Michael Zangari
http://zangarijournalism.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
