Ode,
Simply washing/spraying the products with CS would solve the bacterial
contamination problem. Food irradiation and it's resultant radiolytic
byproducts, not to mention destruction of nutritional value AND huge expense
is certainly not what you are suggesting is the answer to this problem, is
it?
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ode Coyote" <odecoy...@alltel.net>
To: <silver-list@eskimo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 7:37 AM
Subject: Re: CS>Understanding Food Irradiation... in light of consumer
attack
At 03:28 PM 6/17/2008 -0700, you wrote:
You don't understand. They are building the case for food irradiation,
pure and simple.
## Understand that it's the *answered* cry for protection vs the losses of
recalls that is building the case for irradiation as a means of self
defense.
It's either that, or the *industry* goes bust and the entire market goes
alternative, costing more, triggering DIFFERENT demands that can't be met.
Diametrically opposing demands met, require the third alternative.
If cheap food is demanded along with absolute safety, that safety will be
accomplished "Come Hell or High Water" by any means possible ..or else,
NEITHER can be accomplished.....and any *lessor evils* vs *no food at any
price* as the result of a dead industry regulated out of business, swept
under the carpet.
IOW the consumer is screwing himself with untenable absolutes.
The auto industry has been hampered the same way.
Greater safety means more mass and volume. More mass and volume means
less mileage. Simple physics.
In 1994 they could make a car that got 48-55 MPG and meet the safety
mandates of that day
In 1996 that same car made safer to meet new mandates could only do 36-43
MPG and do that, less well. [no pep ]
Mandates made such a pig out of a practical vehicle that no one would buy
it...end of story.
And now, 28-36 MPG is being called "good" when 60 MPG is what's needed,
but made impossible by people who don't feel a need to watch where they're
driving, yet wish to be safe.
Those who can't own the truth will have to buy a lie, or, there's nothing
to sell OR own.
Ode
----- Original Message ----- From: "sol" <sol...@sweetwaterhsa.com>
To: <silver-list@eskimo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 12:37 PM
Subject: Re: CS>Understanding Food Irradiation... in light of consumer
attack
I'm not sure what the total ended up being?
I'm old enough to remember when salmonella was pretty common. In my
youth, "food poisoning" was not all that uncommon. My brother,
sister-in-law, and myself all got what I suspect was salmonella from
take out tacos. Gave us all a very bad 24-48 hrs, and we ran out of TP,
everybody too sick to go get more. It was awful, I was the sickest, and
can remember it clearly, but not one of the 3 of us considered suing the
taco place, or trying to close them down. We sucked it up and went on,
full of pepto-bismol. I guess we were basically healthy enough, nobody
went to a doctor and we all recovered.
That was a different time, seems like it was a different world, 45
years ago. 228 cases last I heard, out of a population of around 300
million. I'm astonished at the uproar, to tell the truth. Particularly
in light of the statistics regarding food borne illnesses on this site:
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/eid/Vol5no5/mead.htm
In any case, I now have CS, and it has been stopping all consequences
whenever I eat "something that has gone off" for the past 6 years or so.
One of the many reasons I'm very grateful to have learned about CS, and
to be able to make and take all I want whenever I need it.
sol
Ode Coyote wrote:
10 people out of 100 million get Salmonella and whole industries grind
to a halt
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...
List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.4.0/1506 - Release Date: 6/17/2008
4:30 PM
