I have started the editing process, but it is such a huge job I have only got a few pages in. If Wayne is willing, I could send him the document as it is, which would at least be "cleaner" than the original emails. I have got the original "all in one" document ("Brook Bradley Posts") down to 3.97 MB, and down to 238 pages. The original document had vast number of spaces because of the original email formatting; there are still a lot, but it is more readable.
As a thankyou for enquiring, here is a randomish selection from deep in the document. It is not fully edited, but just a bit of a taster and fairly legible. Another thing I am trying to do as etiquette is remove the email addresses of the posters; there are a lot in there and I think it would be better to take them out. I hope I have not selected too large a portion to get through the constraints of the website. I am also trying to remember to switch from HTML to plain text, as Mike requests. I had it set always to plain, then for some reason switched to HTML, and was never able to get it back to default plain text, so have to try to remember each time I post. Doesn't always happen, sorry, Mike. But I have taken note and am trying to do it plain text (in case you haven't noticed, this is what Mike requests on the website - the HTML format takes up too much valuable room). Regards Rowena Dear nancy, We have, over the immediately past 15 years, conducted numerous evaluations of various alternative protocols designed to address Benign Hypertropic Prostatitus (BHP), with varying degrees of success. Our most effective results came from a combination of protocols, including granulated kelp (2 tablespoons per day), powdered beta-sitosterol (1 teaspoon daily, divided into two doses), high-intensity LED light array (using 3500 MCD BULBS...in a 10 to 15 bulb assembly) placed in direct contact with skin surface, immediately adjacent to the prostate (twice daily for 30 minute intervals) plus 2000 mg of MAGNESIUM daily (divided into 2 doses). Almost any form of magnesium proved useful, but Magnesium Chloride demonstrated to be somewhat superior to other forms. However, Magnesium oxide, the gluconate form and others, all, were of significant value. One of the profound effects of Magnesium (in BHP cases) is its ability to relax the smooth muscle tissue thus greatly reducing the discomfort of urine evacuation together with a concomitant reduction of urgency. In fact, magnesium proved to be the MOST effective of all protocols in reducing Urgency. Our results in employing DMSO as a topical address for BHP have demonstrated to be somewhat less than satisfactory. Although spectacularly effective in addressing bladder insults of all types (especially of a chronic infectious nature) DMSO has not proven very effective against embedded insults of the prostate proper. One of the reasons the prostate is so difficult to treat for chronic infections is the nature of the tissue itself. The prostate tissue is similar to a sponge in character and the challenge is similar to attempting to remove sand from a sponge by wringing/squeezing it out physically - -a difficult chore at best. Any protocol, including hot sitz-baths, which improves the circulation to the prostate area, has been found to be beneficial and comforting to the sufferer from among our volunteer population. The LED protocol has the additional advantage over sitz-bath through being much less demanding in application, and can be executed either sitting-up or laying in bed plus effecting a very high concentration of increased circulation in a much more confined target area. While Saw Palmetto (either extract or tea from berries) does, indeed, aid BHP, it is simply not as powerful or as rapid in effect as is beta-sitosterol. In fact, it was the serendipitous discovery that beta-sitosterol was the most effective ingredient in saw palmetto, which prompted the search for other, more concentrated sources of that substance. I hope these comments prove to be of value to list members. Sincerely, Brooks Bradley. >Subject : Re: CS> CS & DMSO>Date : Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:03:23 -0500 >Do you think the DMSO would help CS to get to prostatitus, which is an infection of the prostate? CS alone does not do it. >Nancy... > >>I have read that DMSO is effective (as a transport for getting CS deeper into tissues) at as low as 2%. My experience seems to confirm it. >> sol >> Dear nancy, We have, over the immediately past 15 years, conducted numerous evaluations of various alternative protocols designed to address Benign Hypertropic Prostatitus (BHP), with varying degrees of success. Our most effective results came from a combination of protocols, including granulated kelp (2 tablespoons per day), powdered beta-sitosterol (1 teaspoon daily, divided into two doses), high-intensity LED light array (using 3500 MCD BULBS...in a 10 to 15 bulb assembly) placed in direct contact with skin surface, immediately adjacent to the prostate (twice daily for 30 minute intervals) plus 2000 mg of MAGNESIUM daily (divided into 2 doses). Almost any form of magnesium proved useful, but Magnesium Chloride demonstrated to be somewhat superior to other forms. However, Magnesium oxide, the gluconate form and others, all, were of significant value. One of the profound effects of Magnesium (in BHP cases) is its ability to relax the smooth muscle tissue thus greatly reducing the discomfort of urine evacuation together with a concomitant reduction of urgency. In fact, magnesium proved to be the MOST effective of all protocols in reducing Urgency. Our results in employing DMSO as a topical address for BHP have demonstrated to be somewhat less than satisfactory. Although spectacularly effective in addressing bladder insults of all types (especially of a chronic infectious nature) DMSO has not proven very effective against embedded insults of the prostate proper. One of the reasons the prostate is so difficult to treat for chronic infections is the nature of the tissue itself. The prostate tissue is similar to a sponge in character and the challenge is similar to attempting to remove sand from a sponge by wringing/squeezing it out physically - -a difficult chore at best. Any protocol, including hot sitz-baths, which improves the circulation to the prostate area, has been found to be beneficial and comforting to the sufferer from among our volunteer population. The LED protocol has the additional advantage over sitz-bath through being much less demanding in application, and can be executed either sitting-up or laying in bed plus effecting a very high concentration of increased circulation in a much more confined target area. While Saw Palmetto (either extract or tea from berries) does, indeed, aid BHP, it is simply not as powerful or as rapid in effect as is beta-sitosterol. In fact, it was the serendipitous discovery that beta-sitosterol was the most effective ingredient in saw palmetto, which prompted the search for other, more concentrated sources of that substance. I hope these comments prove to be of value to list members. Sincerely, Brooks Bradley. Hello Marshall, The amounts of Magnesium involved in this protocol are many times lower than required to create consequential upsets within the physiology of any but the MOST SYSTEMICALLY CHALLENGED INDIVIDUALS.. Much disruptive and inaccurate information relating to the Calcium/Magnesium relationship has been bandied about by many persons who do not have correct information .and even less research in the matter. For example, with some notable exceptions, most of the general population ingests an EXCESS of calcium ..much of it from un-noticed sources in the general food supply. Magnesium is, in most cases, in short supply for insuring good health in the average adult. We do not contend that the proportional relationship between magnesium and calcium is of no consequence as there is a proven interaction which is important in human health. However, we do contend that the ACTUAL necesary proportions of SUPPLEMENTAL ADDITIONS (MOST ESPECIALLY OF CALCIUM FRACTIONS)are considerably different from a majority of the popular media claims, and overblown in their specific importance relative to stated exactitudes of percentages. The problem of TOO MUCH CALCIUM is, we seem to find, much more prevalent than too little. The central problem revolves around calcium UTILIZATION .not gross intake. The long-lived bromide about calcium shortages had its inception, primarily, as a result of studies (many quite flawed) relating to osteoporosis conditions manifesting in post-menopausal women. My short answer to your observation is, simply, that 1000 mg daily of supplemental magnesium....for adults consuming anything but a nutritionally-starved diet....will pose very, very, small corrective demands on the systemic functions ..at least this has been our experience - others may have effected different results. We have found that magnesium is woefully unresearched and denied its recognition warranted for MANY undeclared benefits in human health. Adult males, especially, are as a group....chronically deficient in sufficient magnesium levels required for best health. Additional calcium (unless of a high magnitude [over 2000 mg] would probably not impose any reduction of the magnesium's benefits. However, for the previously-mentioned reasons....I do not feel such to be a required component to this protocol. If one has personal reservations relative to ingesting 1000 mg of magnesium without an additional calcium supplement, then 500 mg of some form of EASILY assimilated calcium can be ingested .if only to satiate their personal health paradigm. Be Well Marshall, Brooks. p.s. As a personal anecdote I relate that I have ingested 1500 mg of magnesium chloride daily (without any form of buffering or companion substance) for the past 3 years without experiencing any form of compromise. However, I do take two tablespoons daily, of Thorvin kelp....which would tend to ameliorate mineral-induced excursions - from a wide variety among the body's roster of minerals. >Subject : Re: CS> CS & DMSO:COMMENT >Date : Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:57:42 -0500 >From : Marshall Dudley >Thank you very much for this very informative posting. I do have one >question. You are recommending taking large dosages of Magnesium. It >was my understanding that magnesium and calcium should be taken >together, that taking one without the other can lead to some >imbalances. Do you have any information on this? Should calcium not be >taken as well to maintain a balance, or would calcium reduce the >effectiveness of the protocol? Thanks, Marshall Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2008 11:38 AM Subject: CS>BB Posts from Rowena Is anyone else finding the Brooks Bradley posts from Rowena scrambled looking? Has anyone fixed any where they can resend? Thanks in advance, Cindy -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down... List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>