I think I would let someone else sort the dates. I have kept them where they have not disappeared in some firestorm. I have put them into one Word document for my own convenience in editing; in due time I would likely put titles in capitals above the posts, and then possibly group them, but that is far away. I like the dates kept in, and the sender where possible, but without the email address.
The single document is more convenient for me for editing. They are just as I downloaded from your site, then the HTML shrapnel pulled out as best I can. Then masses of spaces, or pointy signs etc pulled out. It will be up to the reader to sort out what goes where, I think; it is too much of a responsibility for me to decide; also where there is a repetition of a whole post I have sometimes left it in in case there is something I miss, other times where I am fairly certain I am not destroying anything new. When the whole document is done, I will divide it up into X no of pages, probably, trying to keep topics together, and send to you for the site in my own space-saving, paper-saving format. Scrooge format. But if I should send it to you in some HTML type format, let me know. If anyone is disappointed I will give them their money back. I had better leave it for now, as I have become a bit obsessive and as soon as I have cleaned one post, I look at the one below and can't leave it alone. Must go to the shops to get some unlabelled sprayed and fertilised and antibioticised food for the weekend. DH has come in from the garden to clean up to take me down there, so I don't think I will be sending any titbits for a few hours, but boy there is some interesting stuff to post. You had better all send me nice little notes offlist to keep me going! Aching and sore but just a little bit triumphant Rowena In Winter Australia ----- Original Message ----- From: Wayne Fugitt To: [email protected] Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2008 3:22 PM Subject: CS>File methods and names. At 01:00 AM 6/21/2008, you wrote: It is just a pity to turn it all from email back to word and then back to email - or is it? Who would do that and why ? I will put then in the same location as the others. If someone else wants to put them in a special place, they can do that easily. I wish you could leave the date on the messages, and group them by year, or maybe two years. ect. The files should be 50 to 100 K, not 250 K or one meg. But that is not etched in stone. I am sure you have worked out you technique and method. We would all do it a bit different. I would export before editing, and certainly not paste, due to speed. You can highlight a number of messages, and export them in one process. Very Fast. Not sure how many, but maybe several. If I had the time and energy, I would write a program to do the whole smear, ( or most of it ) automatically. I have done such things in the past. Anyway you want to do it is OK with me. Consider making several files. It would help people to make reference, by saying that is covered in 2005 or 2006. Wayne ============================= -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: [email protected] Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected] The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down... List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
