Clayton Family wrote:
Yes, the cold fushion guys really stumbled onto something, and I think
it was reproduced too.
There have been thousands of successful reproductions. Some devices have
produced outputs 10 times input, and it is rather easy to get 1.5 to 2
times input using such methods as glow discharge electrolysis. Anyone
taking the time to look into it will find that it was definitely a
suppressed technology.
Marshall
The men I am aware of (at Laurence Livermore Labs) that are working on
clean nuclear tech are anti cold fushion, but only because they don't
think it can work. They did not do the experiment, though, so they did
not disprove it either....
Kathryn
On Oct 24, 2008, at 10:21 AM, Marshall Dudley wrote:
Methods to get rid of radioactive substances have been know for about
2 decades, but have been suppressed since it would eliminate the very
profitable nuclear disposal industry. Also, if admitted, it would
prove that cold fusion is real, and the oil industry does not want
that either. Hopefully this will change in the next few years.
Marshall
Jonathan B. Britten wrote:
Apologies for going off topic, but this is so extraordinary that it
deserves widespread dissemination:
http://tinyurl.com/5od68l
If the claim is true, there may be an effective solution to the
problem of nuclear waste. Hope it's for real . . . while also
hoping for major funding of solar, wind, water, and geothermal options.
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...
List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
