On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 08:10:18PM -0700, Malcolm wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 22:45 -0400, Indi wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 07:30:51PM -0700, Malcolm wrote:
> > > He used the word "true" rather than "pure".
> > > The DMSO from my local horse and cow store used to say 99.85% pure DMSO
> > > on it, but they changed the label to read 99%; same Company, and also
> > > added a disclaimer about human use.
> > > 
> > 
> > Oh thanks, I didn't realize that. What do you suppose it means though?
>
> Lawyers, Torts and Money?
>

That's what I think.

> > My impression is that it's all the same stuff really. After all, DMSO 
> > is a "waste byproduct" of wood pulping, as in manufacturing paper.
> > And at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimethyl_sulfoxide it appears to suggest
> > there are pretty much only three actual sources?
> 
> There were some claims that the U.S. manufacturer (Lignisul??) was
> 'better' than the Chinese one.  Now we're up to three?  Perhaps  a
> 'producer' is not the same as a 'manufacturer'?
>

Maybe I'll look into that tamari, right now it's time to hit the hay.

> Take care, 
> Malcolm
> 

You too,
-- 
indi


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com

The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...

List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>