On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 08:10:18PM -0700, Malcolm wrote: > On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 22:45 -0400, Indi wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 07:30:51PM -0700, Malcolm wrote: > > > He used the word "true" rather than "pure". > > > The DMSO from my local horse and cow store used to say 99.85% pure DMSO > > > on it, but they changed the label to read 99%; same Company, and also > > > added a disclaimer about human use. > > > > > > > Oh thanks, I didn't realize that. What do you suppose it means though? > > Lawyers, Torts and Money? >
That's what I think. > > My impression is that it's all the same stuff really. After all, DMSO > > is a "waste byproduct" of wood pulping, as in manufacturing paper. > > And at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimethyl_sulfoxide it appears to suggest > > there are pretty much only three actual sources? > > There were some claims that the U.S. manufacturer (Lignisul??) was > 'better' than the Chinese one. Now we're up to three? Perhaps a > 'producer' is not the same as a 'manufacturer'? > Maybe I'll look into that tamari, right now it's time to hit the hay. > Take care, > Malcolm > You too, -- indi -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down... List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>