Whew! James Osbourne, Holmes a...@trail.com
-----Original Message----- From: Ivan Anderson [SMTP:i...@win.co.nz] Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 1999 5:44 AM To: Silver-List Subject: Re: CS>Ion size was buying CS Hi Bob, Well lets see, webelements provide three or four different atom sizes, some derived theoretically and others empirically, and five measurements of the monovalent ion. The size depends upon the geometry and the environment. The Tanner calculation is for the *effective* ion size in an aqueous environment. The wave method (in water? sonic or light?) has wide use in scientific instruments, but from what I have seen so far is reaching its limits at these sizes. But the difference is not large and may lie in the margin of error. Ivan. ----- Original Message ----- From: Tai-Pan <l...@fbtc.net> To: <silver-list@eskimo.com> Sent: Wednesday, 1 September 1999 06:01 Subject: Re: CS>Ion size was buying CS > Ivan Anderson wrote: > > > > James, > > go here : > > http://www.tannerm.com/electrochemistry/ion_speeds/IonSpeeds.htm > > > Hi Ivan, > In the Tanner web page on ion mobility they calculated the ion radii. > Found the calculation of Ag+1 radius via the Stokes-Einstein Equation > to be interesting. It shows a radii of 1.49A (0.149nm) while wave > mechics shows 1.37A. A neutral Ag is considered to be 1.44A. Any > thoughts on this ? > > Bless you Bob Lee > -- > oozing on the muggy shore of the gulf coast > l...@fbtc.net -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@id.net>
