I didn't like the flush at first but have grown to like it as long as it is mild (not like the first try). As far as the data is concerned a doctor told me about it and I regarded it as general knowledge because he knew about it. I've run across it in a number of articles I have read. Didn't save or record them as I believe we need our cholesterol especially if we are taking vitamin C. Dave
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 9:14 AM, TREM <t...@silvergen.com> wrote: > Steve and Dave, > > I take 3 grams daily of Slo-Niacin becuse I won't take statins. Cn't stand > the flush of regular Niacin. My doc told me it would drop the cholesterol. > Where did you get your data? > > Trem > > > > > On 1/29/2010 8:48 AM, Norton, Steve wrote: > > My understanding is that the no-flush niacin does not lower cholesterol. > It does however help with Alzheimer’s if taken in large enough doses. > > - Steve N > > > > *From:* Dave Darrin [mailto:davedar...@gmail.com <davedar...@gmail.com>] > *Sent:* Friday, January 29, 2010 7:51 AM > *To:* silver-list@eskimo.com > *Subject:* Re: CS>about niacin > > > > The no-flush type is recommended for lowering cholesterol for those that > have a hard time accepting the flush. > The real stuff is also a good way to increase circulation as well as the > cholesterol lowering which the slow release doesn't do. > Dave > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Annie B Smythe <anniebsmy...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I'm curious Jose, > > I've been researching th differences in the Niacin forms. What benefits can > you get from the Niacin bound to Inositol? And so far what you've said lines > up with the reading I've been doing. I just don't know why the > Niacin/Inositol would be recommended by a doctor instead of regular Niacin. > For instance it's a recommended Niacin type in the Iodine Protocol. The > literature says it doesn't have the same effect but then it frustrates the > devil out of me because it won't say what the differences are or what > effects it actually has that are beneficial. Do you know? I'd be grateful > for clearing up of the muddled information I've found. > > Annie > > > > >