Ah, but GMO's ARE bad for you. Nature will selectively modify organisms over
time... basically the fittest survive. For man to alter the genetic makeup of
a cell by introducing foreign genes (from animals into plants for instance) is
sheer folly, frought with all sorts of potential catastrophies not only for the
flora involved (and others nearby), but also by the humans that end up
ingesting these frankenfoods. Allergic reactions are just one of the potential
side effects. We cannot adopt to changes quickly, it can take centuries. GMO
foods have the potential of wiping out all living things and should be banned
immediatly.
----- Original Message -----
From: Alan Jones
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 10:09 AM
Subject: Re: CS>Take a stand now and reject Mon San To's GMO drive
The point is not so much, are GMOs bad for you, it's consumers have a right
to know which foods are GMO.
Do you don't disagree with that?
Alan
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Steve G <chube...@yahoo.com> wrote:
I have absolutely no concerns about Genetically modified fruits and
vegetables.
In my mind genetically modified means that there has been an
organized hybridization effort as opposed to the natural course of evolution
which does the same thing, but by accident rather than by design.
Big deal.
--
Alan Jones
