See below. -----Original Message----- From: Jonathan B. Britten [mailto:jbrit...@nakamura-u.ac.jp] Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 6:46 PM To: silver-list@eskimo.com Subject: Re: CS>44 PPM [GishPuppy]
Some years back Frank Key posted a reply to a debate that was going on then, about particles versus ions I think, and/or manufacturing protocol. It's all in the archives. (If memory serves me, a person who wants particles could distill out the ions by adding salt and waiting for the sodium chloride to sink to the bottom -- it's been a while and I'd have to check the archives to be sure.) What did stick in my mind was his very clear statement that the EIS produced by members on this list, using a variety of methods, is efficacious. That, for me, was the bottom line. 11-26-2005 Featherwon wrote: >> Before i purchased the SilverGen, i was using Sovereign Silver, but >> it became too expensive. A small amount was effective, and im >> wondering what dossage of the silvergen will equal Sovereign Silver? Provided that you get you concentration to 10 ppm, lab analysis of the physical properties indicates there should be no distinguishable difference between what you make with a home generator and Sovereign Silver. Both are ionic silver with a small percentage of silver nanoparticles present. The TEM images do not contain a valid representation of colloidal particles present. Frank Key www.ColloidalScienceLab.com -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org Unsubscribe: <mailto:silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com?subject=unsubscribe> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/silver-list@eskimo.com/maillist.html Off-Topic discussions: <mailto:silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com> List Owner: Mike Devour <mailto:mdev...@eskimo.com>
