Hi Ken:

Beware of individuals claiming false expertise.

First off, "zappers" were firsted tested by individuals such as Royal Rife and Nikola Tesla. These ideas were then eventually borrowed, with an attempt at a refinement, by individuals such as Bob Beck and Hulda Clark.

Second, my experience is that the hulda clark type zapper is only marginally effective. However, for many individuals, "marginally" is enough to give the immune system enough support to recover.

One of the problems with Hulda Clark type zappers is the actual waveform. Just like Royal Rife was working with very ineffective technology, most of the Hulda Clark zappers don't produce a true square wave form, which inhibits any potential effectiveness. A device such as the "Godzilla" is far more effective to treat localized conditions.

When using one of the more technically correct and properly engineered zappers, the effectiveness is increased. However, as the saying goes, the pathogen is nothing and the bioterrain is everything. For severe chronic systemic infections, the best one can hope for using anti-pathogenic devices and substances is to help keep the bloodstream clean and support the immune system, and thus improve the body's own ability to address infections.

As far as electrodes, use an extremely clean cloth moistened with a high grade sea salt solution. Being concerned about the adsorption of metals through such a cloth into the body is like worrying about a neighbor's candle when your house is burning down. I would be far more concerned about toxicity from the average air sample in metropolitan areas.

BTW: One of the simpler ways to test the effectiveness of zappers is by contrasting before and after live blood analysis studies.

Kind Regards,

Jason


----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Monett" <mrmon...@pstca.com>
To: "SilverList" <silver-list@eskimo.com>
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 19:05
Subject: Re: CS>Making 100% colloidal EIS



 > Hi Mike, Regarding "Zappers", it sounds like you are talking about
 > the devices that Hulda Clark popularized over the past 20 years or
 > so (I first read her books in 1994 or so). Is that the case? I use
 > a zapper  occasionally  if I get a bad cold  or  upper respiratory
 > infection. But I have never heard of what you mentioned  about the
 > copper hand holds depositing copper ions into the skin  (I covered
 > them with 2 layers of paper towel), or other materials, depositing
 > who knows  what into the skin. Do you have a  recommendation  on a
 > material that  is  safe  to use with a Zapper?  I  have  found the
 > zapper to  be  extremely  useful at times  of  viral  or bacterial
 > infection -  it doesn't seem to cure the problem outright,  but it
 > definitely seems  to have a positive effect (in my  case,  pain or
 > congestion in  the sinuses or throat is usually  alleviated  for a
 > few hours after a zapping session). -Ken

 Ken,

 Zappers were  proposed by Bob Beck and Hulda Clark. Beck  claimed to
 be a  physicist, and would have known that electrons cannot  flow in
 an electrolyte.  However, he claimed his Zapper could  do  just that
 and that it would cure all diseases.

 Here is  a  1998  talk where Beck claims his  Zapper  will  kill ALL
 pathogens and  parasites,   including   HIV.   He  claims  the blood
 circulates in the body in 9 or 10 seconds (5:00). This is  false. It
 takes a minute or so.

 Note also that he uses stainless steel electrodes. Please  see below
 for more information.

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yC7M_rhg2yU

 Clearly the device does not do what he claims. If it did,  HIV would
 not exist,  and  we would not need antibiotics.  Every  hospital and
 clinic would be using them instead. That is obviously not true.

 Hulda Clark has a slightly different version and made much  the same
 claims. However,  she  also  claimed to  have  the  ability  to cure
 cancer. However, Hulda Clark died of cancer in 2009.

 From Wikipedia:

 Clark's claims  and  devices   have  been  dismissed  by authorities
 ranging from  the  US  Federal Trade Commission  and  Food  and Drug
 Administration to  alternative medicine figures such as  Andrew Weil
 as    scientifically   unfounded,   "bizarre",[3]   and  potentially
 fraudulent.[2] Clark  died 3 September 2009 of  multiple  myeloma (a
 blood and bone cancer).[4][5][6]

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hulda_Regehr_Clark

 Hulda's Zapper  supposedly  worked by shaking  or  vibrating  a germ
 until it  falls  apart,  like  the  famous  Memorex  commercial that
 shatters a wine glass.

 However, bacteria are not brittle like crystal, and there is  no way
 any energy from a Zapper could reach them. The first problem is skin
 effect that  causes high frequencies to travel on the  outside  of a
 body and not penetrate very deeply. The second problem is the energy
 in the  harmonics  falls   off   extremely   rapidly,  and  there is
 negligible energy  at  the frequencies that  might  resonate  with a
 bacterial cell.

 Again, if  her device worked as she claims, we would no  longer have
 any illness,  and all the pharmaceutical companies  would  have gone
 out of business long ago. These devices would be used in  every home
 and clinic, and about the only thing we would need doctors for would
 be the occasional broken bone.

 None of this has happened.

 Your sinus  irritation might be caused by low  humidity  which dries
 the sinuses.  It could also be caused by irritation from  the toxins
 in mold  spores,  possibly from your pillow. It could  be  caused by
 mold spores coming from padded furniture or an infestation buried in
 walls or some hidden place in the basement.

 In these cases, the Zapper has no effect and the soreness  is simply
 going away  by  itself  as you move about or  open  the  windows for
 ventilation.

 The copper  ions released by the iontophoreses  travel  very slowly,
 especially with the low voltage present.

 It is  very  unlikely that a Zapper is able to do  anything  to help
 bacterial infections  that are located more than  a  few centimeters
 beneath the surface. It is extremely unlikely that Zapping will have
 any effect on viral infections.

 However, copper is easily corroded and it is very difficult  to find
 pure copper  that  has not been contaminated by  oxidation  or other
 sources. The  copper  in  wire  is  very  pure,  but  the insulation
 material releases  contamination   that   quickly   embeds  into the
 surface. Also, the manufacturing process does nothing to  remove the
 lubrication needed to draw the wire through the dies, so they remain
 on the  surface  where they will migrate inwards  over  a  period of
 time.

 I just went through a lengthy exercise to try to scrap and  sand the
 contamination from  the surface of 12 ga copper wire. Even  though I
 removed a  substantial  amount  of material  from  the  surface, the
 copper still  proved to be severely contaminated. You would  have to
 find wire with an inert insulation such as Teflon,  and freshly-made
 so any contaminating oils from the drawing operation would  not have
 enough time to migrate into the surface.

 Under no  circumstance should you ever use stainless  steel  for the
 electrodes. This could be extremely dangerous. Please see my note in

 http://www.mail-archive.com/silver-list@eskimo.com/msg145183.html

 If you  are  getting bad colds or infections, your  cs  is  not good
 enough.

 You should  never  find the need to resort to Zapping  when  you are
 taking quality cs with a silver ion concentration above 20uS.

 Thanks,

 Mike


--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
 Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org

Unsubscribe:
 <mailto:silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Archives:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/silver-list@eskimo.com/maillist.html

Off-Topic discussions: <mailto:silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com>
List Owner: Mike Devour <mailto:mdev...@eskimo.com>