Many seem to quote wikipedia, I doubt this source is all that reliable. I certainly wouldn't quote from it as any form of authority on subject matters such as these anyway, and I'm only a mug punter. Correct me if I'm wrong, but from all my readings about Rife his *personal* researched material was destroyed, and his sidekicks attempted to duplicate from memory did they not? And I'm not exactly sure if *everything* he did was documented? Again from my readings, he failed to repeat his purported successes after the ruination of him and the destruction of his material. N.
> From: mrmon...@pstca.com > To: silver-list@eskimo.com > Subject: Re: CS>Making 100% colloidal EIS > Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 22:59:46 -0400 > > Hi Jason, > > No reputable researcher has been able to duplicate Royal Rife's results. > From Wikipedia: > > Rife's claims could not be independently replicated, [5] and were > ultimately discredited by the medical profession in the 1950s. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Rife > > Many of the claims attributed to Tesla never happened. > > None of Beck's claims that he made in the YouTube video have materialized. > > There is nothing you can do to change the fact electrons cannot flow in an > electrolyte. > > A blood analysis doesn't mean much. It is a complex procedure that is > easily derailed by poor technique or measurements. > > The fundamental proof is does it work? The answer is no. Most of the > effects attributed to zappers can easily be explained by other factors. > > I am an expert in instrumentation design and analysis. My credentials are > as follows: > > 1. I am a retired electronics engineer with over 50 years of experience in > instrumentation and control systems. These are among the most difficult > fields in electronics. > > 2. I had my own company from 1976 until I retired recently. > > 3. I have been awarded 6 US patents involving hard disk drives. My patent > list is here: > > http://pstca.com/patents.htm > > The statements I made are obviously true and can be observed by anyone. > These devices are not used in clinics or any place where their performance > can be monitored and verified. > > There is no need to belittle contamination on the electrodes. It is a very > real and significant problem. Ignoring it could cause you serious harm. I > once got some kind of contamination on my silver electrodes when I laid > them on my workbench and they must have touched a spot of oil or grease. I > was so sick after taking cs made with these electrodes that it took three > days in bed to recover. I now keep a second glass to hold the assembly > while I am filling the cs generator with dw or emptying the cs, and I do > not allow the electrodes to touch anything. Do not underestimate the danger > of contamination. It can really harm you. > > There is no need to resort to dubious and overhyped gadgets when they have > no effect on the most basic pathogen, viruses. > > There is no need to mess with a non-functional technology when a high > quality ionic cs will vastly outperform any of the claims made by biased > and undereducated individuals. > > Thanks, > > Mike Monett > > "Jason R Eaton" <ja...@eytonsearth.org> wrote: > > > >Hi Ken: > > > >Beware of individuals claiming false expertise. > > > >First off, "zappers" were firsted tested by individuals such as Royal Rife > >and Nikola Tesla. These ideas were then eventually borrowed, with an > >attempt at a refinement, by individuals such as Bob Beck and Hulda Clark. > > > >Second, my experience is that the hulda clark type zapper is only marginally > >effective. However, for many individuals, "marginally" is enough to give > >the immune system enough support to recover. > > > >One of the problems with Hulda Clark type zappers is the actual waveform. > >Just like Royal Rife was working with very ineffective technology, most of > >the Hulda Clark zappers don't produce a true square wave form, which > >inhibits any potential effectiveness. A device such as the "Godzilla" is > >far more effective to treat localized conditions. > > > >When using one of the more technically correct and properly engineered > >zappers, the effectiveness is increased. However, as the saying goes, the > >pathogen is nothing and the bioterrain is everything. For severe chronic > >systemic infections, the best one can hope for using anti-pathogenic devices > >and substances is to help keep the bloodstream clean and support the immune > >system, and thus improve the body's own ability to address infections. > > > >As far as electrodes, use an extremely clean cloth moistened with a high > >grade sea salt solution. Being concerned about the adsorption of metals > >through such a cloth into the body is like worrying about a neighbor's > >candle when your house is burning down. I would be far more concerned about > >toxicity from the average air sample in metropolitan areas. > > > >BTW: One of the simpler ways to test the effectiveness of zappers is by > >contrasting before and after live blood analysis studies. > > > >Kind Regards, > > > >Jason > > > -- > The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. > Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org > > Unsubscribe: > <mailto:silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com?subject=unsubscribe> > Archives: > http://www.mail-archive.com/silver-list@eskimo.com/maillist.html > > Off-Topic discussions: <mailto:silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com> > List Owner: Mike Devour <mailto:mdev...@eskimo.com> > >
