The idea of reversing polarity during the manufacturing process is a very bad idea and obvious design flaw. Far better to select one electrode, and make a mark at the top with a pair of pliers, then simply connect it to positive one run , then negative the next, keeping note of dates you use the marked electrode with neg or pos current.
The reason for this is that you will accrue a large amount of dark oxides which should not be disturbed during manufacturing. If they get into the sol (colloid) then the ions coming of the electrode will then stick to those chunks and your sol will bottom out much quicker, the particles also being less therapeutically beneficial as they will be getting so large to the point where they will just not be able to pass inside cell tissue and kill pathogens, also creating more possibility of argyria skin discolouration, though that can be lessened or even removed with selenium supplementation to chelate it from the skin I read. The regular changing of polarity will just push a load of muck into the distilled water and act as a magnet for the smaller groups of ions to stick to. With best wishes, Dave On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 1:32 AM, HARSHA GODAVARI <h.godav...@shaw.ca> wrote: > I am considering using this to make colloidal silver. I like the idea of > reversing polarity because it will slow down a build_up of CS near one > electrode and both electrodes (hopefully) wear evenly. Also I have one of > these around and it will save a bit for the time being :-) > > Are there any "cons (& pros)" to this notion. I would appreciate your > thoughts on this. Thank you. > > regards > hg > >
