Thank you Marshall for clarifying the problem. When I used 3 (x9v) batteries to make my CS and was too lazy to stirr the solution I did get the black oxides.
Two things happened, the batteries and my electrodes vanished some how ( I suspect some protector of the nation from 90 year old ladie's prosthetics and/or two pieces of silver wire :-) ) I have a Beck purifier thats not being used ( I have a vague notion that not using a useful item is a "sin") I see no reason why it can't be used instead of my three, naked batteries. This Beck purifier also uses 3 x 9v batteries for its power source, only they are enclosed in a box . Nice to hear from you. regards hg ----- Original Message ----- From: Marshall <mdud...@king-cart.com> Date: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 5:46 pm Subject: Re: CS>Beck blood purifier To: silver-list@eskimo.com > Reversing polarity of the electrodes while making CS is an > effective and widely used method of decreasing buildup of silver > and oxides of silver on the electrodes. I have made > thousands of gallons of CS, and I reverse every minute, on a two > minute cycle. Reversing eliminates the dark oxides because > the electrode which forms the oxide is exposed to monoatomic > hydrogen during the next half cycle, and the hydrogen > immediately reacts with the oxide reducing the silver oxide to > silver. Also any silver powder that accumulates on an > electrode, either by reduction of silver oxide, or by deposition > of silver from the solution, goes back out on the next half > cycle as well. The result is electrodes which stay > amazingly clean and never need to be cleaned. I can > typically make several thousand gallons of CS on a set of > electrodes and have never ever had to clean them. > > Also I have never witnessed any silver oxide coming loose due to > polarity switching. If any were to come loose it would be > from the stirring of the water, not a polarity switch. > > Marshall > > On 10/10/2012 6:31 PM, D B wrote: > >The idea of reversing polarity during the manufacturing process > is a very bad idea and obvious design flaw. Far better to select > one electrode, and make a mark at the top with a pair of pliers, > then simply connect it to positive one run , then negative the > next, keeping note of dates you use the marked electrode with > neg or pos current. > > > >The reason for this is that you will accrue a large amount of > dark oxides which should not be disturbed during manufacturing. > If they get into the sol (colloid) then the ions coming of the > electrode will then stick to those chunks and your sol will > bottom out much quicker, the particles also being less > therapeutically beneficial as they will be getting so large to > the point where they will just not be able to pass inside cell > tissue and kill pathogens, also creating more possibility of > argyria skin discolouration, though that can be lessened or even > removed with selenium supplementation to chelate it from the > skin I read. The regular changing of polarity will just push a > load of muck into the distilled water and act as a magnet for > the smaller groups of ions to stick to. > > > >With best wishes, Dave > > > >On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 1:32 AM, HARSHA GODAVARI > <h.godav...@shaw.ca <mailto:h.godav...@shaw.ca>> wrote: > > > > I am considering using this to make > colloidal silver. I like the > > idea of reversing polarity because it will > slow down a build_up of > > CS near one electrode and both electrodes > (hopefully) wear evenly. > > Also I have one of these around and it will > save a bit for the > > time being :-) > > > > Are there any "cons (& pros)" to this > notion. I would appreciate > > your thoughts on this. Thank you. > > > > regards > > hg > > > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------- > -------- > > > >No virus found in this message. > >Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com> > >Version: 10.0.1427 / Virus Database: 2441/5322 - Release Date: > 10/10/12> > >
